House votes to end federal funding of NPR

Democrats call mostly party-line vote a vendetta

The US House-approved measure to ban the use of federal funds for National Public Radio now moves to the Democrat-controlled Senate, where passage is doubtful. The US House-approved measure to ban the use of federal funds for National Public Radio now moves to the Democrat-controlled Senate, where passage is doubtful. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Associated Press / March 18, 2011

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Text size +

WASHINGTON — The House yesterday voted to end federal funding to National Public Radio. Republican supporters said it made good fiscal sense while Democratic opponents called it an ideological attack that would deprive local stations of access to programs such as “Car Talk’’ and “All Things Considered.’’

The bill, passed 228 to 192 along mainly partisan lines, would bar federal funding of NPR and prohibit local public stations from using federal money to pay NPR dues and buy its programs. The prospects of support in the Democratic-controlled Senate are slim. Seven Republicans broke ranks to vote against the bill.

NPR received almost $5 million in federal funding in fiscal year 2010. In that year its revenues also included $2.8 million in dues and $63 million in programming fees from local stations, its largest single source of revenue. Under the bill, stations would still be allowed to buy NPR programs using private funds and use federal funds to produce their own programs.

“It is time for American citizens to stop funding an organization that can stand on its own feet,’’ said Representative Doug Lamborn, Republican of Colorado, the bill’s sponsor. He said it was not a question of content — which many conservatives say has a liberal bias — but whether taxpayer dollars should go to nonessential services. “As a country we no longer have this luxury.’’

Other Republicans also denied that the measure was a vendetta against NPR, although the organization left itself open to conservative attacks last week when an executive, talking to conservative activists posing as members of a fake Muslim group, was caught on a heavily edited video deriding the Tea Party movement and saying that NPR would be better off without federal funding. Both the executive and the president of NPR resigned after the incident.

“Nobody’s on a rampage,’’ said majority leader Eric Cantor, Republican of Virginia, who also asked, “Why should we allow taxpayer dollars to be used to advocate one ideology?’’

Democrats retorted that the legislation would do nothing to reduce the deficit and would be a blow to local public stations that rely on the national programs that include “Morning Edition’’ and “Wait, Wait . . . Don’t Tell Me’’ to attract listeners.

“This bill would pull the plug,’’ said Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts. “It would snuff out stations from coast to coast, many in rural areas where the public radio station is the primary source of news and information.’’

The White House said it “strongly opposed’’ the bill and voiced similar objections, saying “undercutting funding for these radio stations, notably ones in rural areas where such outlets are already scarce, would result in communities losing valuable programming, and some stations could be forced to shut down altogether.’’

The move to curtail federal subsidies for NPR follows a House vote last month, as part of the GOP plan to cut federal spending for the remainder of this budget year, to take back some $86 million budgeted for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the parent organization of NPR.

That proposal, which also faces opposition in the Senate, eliminates $430 million in planned future spending for CPB.

In a statement following the vote, CPB chief executive Patricia Harrison said Americans “overwhelmingly agree that public broadcasting is a service worthy of the federal government’’ and “rather than penalize public broadcasting, the debate should focus on strengthening and supporting this valuable national asset.’’