Derrick Z. Jackson | WEB EXCLUSIVE

Ring the wedding bells

By Derrick Z. Jackson
June 14, 2007
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

LET THE wedding bells ring 151 times for gay couples and a courageous commonwealth.

Not only did the Massachusetts Legislature vote 151-45 today to block a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, the 45 votes for the ban represented a resounding drop from the 62 votes for the amendment last session. The measure needed at least 50 of 200 votes in consecutive sessions to make it to the ballot.

That was a dramatic testament to the fact that legislators concluded that neither the so-called sanctity of matrimony nor the moral fiber of the commonwealth crumbled in the three years of gay marriage.

It was a wonderful way to mark this week's 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Loving decision that outlawed Virginia's laws against interracial marriage. In writing for the majority, Chief Justice Earl Warren cited the absurdities of Virginia's past defense of laws meant to ''maintain white supremacy,'' with fears about ''the corruption of blood'' and ''a mongrel breed of citizens.''

Today, the Legislature rejected similar, antiquated notions of straight supremacy.

Derrick Z. Jackson's e-mail address is

From Today's Globe
 Right of gays to marry set for years to come (By Frank Phillips and Andrea Estes, Globe Staff, 6/15/07)
 Personal stories changed minds (By Lisa Wangsness and Andrea Estes, Globe Staff, 6/15/07)
 Fear and then, 'I can't believe it' (By Yvonne Abraham, Globe Staff, 6/15/07)
 Mass. may inspire advocates in other states to action (By Raja Mishra, Globe Staff, 6/15/07)
 GLOBE EDITORIAL: A good day for marriage
 SCOT LEHIGH: A victory for equality
 JEFF JACOBY | WEB EXCLUSIVE: A political grenade
 DERRICK Z. JACKSON | WEB EXCLUSIVE: Ring the wedding bells
Other coverage
Photo Gallery PHOTO GALLERIES: Reaction to the vote Photo Gallery Protesters
  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Save this article
  • powered by
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.