US ambassador to Afghanistan: Time to move on

FILE - In this June 15, 2010 file photo, U.S. Central Commander Gen. David Petraeus testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, before the Senate Armed Services Committee. President Barack Obama has named Gen. Petraeus to succeed Gen. Stanley McChrystal as top war commander in Afghanistan. FILE - In this June 15, 2010 file photo, U.S. Central Commander Gen. David Petraeus testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, before the Senate Armed Services Committee. President Barack Obama has named Gen. Petraeus to succeed Gen. Stanley McChrystal as top war commander in Afghanistan. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)
By Deb Riechmann
Associated Press Writer / June 24, 2010

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Text size +

KABUL, Afghanistan—The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan on Thursday acknowledged having "vigorous debates" behind closed doors with Gen. Stanley McChrystal, but said he and the ousted NATO commander acted in synch to implement war strategy.

"Stan and I have known each other for a very long time, and worked shoulder-to-shoulder here together under very difficult circumstances over this past year. He was an excellent partner," Ambassador Karl Eikenberry told a group of Afghan reporters.

Eikenberry has clashed with NATO headquarters over the direction of the war. When a cable in which Eikenberry strongly questioned the wisdom of sending tens of thousands more U.S. troops to the war leaked to the media late last year, his relationship with McChrystal became especially strained.

In a Rolling Stone magazine story that led to McChrystal's dismissal, the commander said he felt betrayed by the leak. McChrystal accused Eikenberry of giving himself political cover in case the U.S. military buildup didn't succeed.

"Now if we fail, they can say, `I told you so,'" the magazine quoted McChrystal as saying. The general later called Eikenberry to apologize.

Eikenberry, who says he has not read the article, said it was important to focus on the mission and move beyond President Barack Obama's decision Wednesday to let McChrystal go.

"What is past is past now," Eikenberry said. "The president made a very difficult decision. I will tell you that Stan McChrystal will always remain my friend. He's an extremely good officer. But now here, with regards to this mission, as our president said, it's time to move forward."

Eikenberry pledged to work closely with Gen. David Petraeus, who was picked to succeed McChrystal.

"Our team here in Afghanistan -- our civilian-military team -- we pride ourselves on two things." Eikenberry said.

"One, an environment and a climate where we sit behind closed doors and we can have those kinds of vigorous debates. We also pride ourselves, that when the door opens up, we've reached our decisions and we act with unity and unified effort."

Eikenberry said that is how he would characterize his relationship with McChrystal "and that's exactly the same kind of relationship I'd look forward to having with the new commander."

Eikenberry said he was confident that Petraeus, who has been deeply involved in creating and implementing the Afghan strategy, would be able to take up the new post without losing momentum.

"We continue to have a very clear goal. We are going to break the Taliban's momentum. We are going to build Afghan capacity, especially in the area of your army and your police," Eikenberry said. He declined to comment on his relationship with Karzai, which has appeared strained since his criticism of the leader. He did say that he met with Karzai earlier Thursday.

McChrystal has described a plan to create a "rising tide of security" in southern Taliban strongholds that would win over the civilian population, and NATO commanders have said the next few months will be key to success.

The U.S.-led forces have struggled to stabilize the southern farming town of Marjah -- focus of a major offensive launched early this year -- even as they begin a major effort with Afghan forces to ramp up security in the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar.

In Washington, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told reporters the war in Afghanistan was "slower and harder than anticipated," but that he did not believe the U.S. was "bogged down."

Gates said that progress was being made even if it takes longer than officials thought to help establish the local government and win over the local population.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen said the U.S. will not know if the strategy is working until the end of the year.

It is a difficult time for the military alliance in Afghanistan. At least 80 NATO soldiers have died so far in June, the most in a single month. The previous record was 75 in July 2009.

Four British soldiers were killed in a vehicle accident in southern Helmand province Wednesday. All were in a police advisory team traveling to assist at an incident at a checkpoint when their armored truck had an accident near Gereshk, according to Britain's defense ministry.

In Logar province, south of Kabul, four boys were killed Thursday by a roadside bomb, said Mohammad Rahim Amin, chief of Baraki Barak district. He said the children pulled on a partially buried wire that triggered the explosion.

In the south, NATO and Afghan troops destroyed a bomb factory and killed a Taliban district commander, NATO said in a statement. In all, 15 insurgents were killed in the attack, said Fazal Ahmad Sherzad, the Kandahar provincial security chief.

In northern Kunduz province, the coalition used air strikes to kill "a number" of insurgents, NATO said, without specifying how many.

But Taliban attacks are also continuing. Seven Afghan construction workers were killed in a roadside bomb attack in central Afghanistan on Wednesday. Their vehicle was hit by the remote-controlled explosive in Uruzgan province, and all the passengers were killed, the Interior Ministry said in a statement.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility but violence has been on the rise in recent months as the Taliban make good on promises to meet a NATO and U.S. military surge by increasing attacks and bombings -- sometimes targeting civilians seen as allied with the government or international forces. top stories on Twitter

    waiting for twitterWaiting for Twitter to feed in the latest...