Pakistan tells India it doesn't want war, will continue to fight terrorism

By Chris Brummitt
Associated Press / December 28, 2008
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan told India yesterday that it did not want war and was committed to fighting terrorism - a move apparently aimed at reducing tensions after Pakistan moved troops toward their shared border.

Intelligence officials said Friday that the army was redeploying thousands of troops from the country's fight against militants along the Afghan border to the Indian frontier - an alarming scenario for the West as it tries to get Pakistan to neutralize the Al Qaeda threat.

Islamabad also announced it was canceling all military leave - the latest turn of the screw in the rising tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors after last month's terror attack on the Indian financial capital of Mumbai.

India has blamed Pakistani militants for the terrifying three-day siege. Pakistan's elected civilian government has demanded that India back up the claim with better evidence, but has also said it is committed to fighting the "cancer" of terrorism.

"We ourselves have accepted that we have a cancer," Pakistan's president, Asif Ali Zardari, said in a speech yesterday. "They are forcing their agenda on us."

Zardari has pledged to battle militancy, repeatedly reminding critics that his wife, Benazir Bhutto, was killed in a gun-and-suicide bomb attack blamed on terrorists. Tens of thousands of Pakistanis visited her grave yesterday to mark the first anniversary of her assassination.

But in the four months since Zardari took power - picking up the reins of her Pakistan People's Party after her death - Islamist violence has continued largely unabated.

Many analysts have speculated that the assailants who carried out the Mumbai attacks sought to distract Pakistan by redirecting its focus toward India and away from the military campaign against Al Qaeda and Taliban militants on the Afghan border.

India's foreign minister, Pranab Mukherjee, said yesterday that it was unfortunate that a "sort of war hysteria" has been created in Pakistan.

"I appeal to Pakistan and Pakistani leaders, do not unnecessarily try to create tension," he said, according to the Press Trust of India news agency. "Do not try to deflect the issue. A problem has to be tackled face to face."

Pakistan's latest moves, including the troop redeployment, were seen as an indication that it will retaliate if India launches air or missile strikes against militant targets on Pakistani soil - rather than as a signal that a fourth war between the two was imminent.

US officials are watching the troop movements with concern because the move poses a double-barreled threat: a possible confrontation between two nuclear powers and a shift by Pakistani military away from battling militants.

The United States has been trying to ease the tensions between Pakistan and India while also pressing Pakistan to crack down on the militants Washington says were probably responsible for the Mumbai attack. The siege left 164 people dead after gunmen targeted 10 sites.

Two Pakistani intelligence officials - requesting anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation - said Friday that elements of the army's 14th Infantry Division were being redeployed from the militant hotspot of Waziristan to the towns of Kasur and Sialkot, close to the Indian border.

The military began the troop movement Thursday and plans to shift a total of 20,000 soldiers - about one-fifth of those in the tribal areas, they said without providing a timetable.

Witnesses reported seeing long convoys carrying troops and equipment toward India on Thursday and Friday, but there was no sign of fresh movement yesterday, suggesting the country was not rushing the troops to the frontier.

Another intelligence official said yesterday that up to 1,300 troops had also been pulled out of Bajur region, the scene of a major Pakistani offensive against the Taliban. They were transported to a large base back from the Afghan border, the official said, also speaking on the condition of anonymity. But their final destination was not immediately known.

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Save this article
  • powered by
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.