boston.com News your connection to The Boston Globe

Bush stands firm against Kyoto pact

WASHINGTON -- President Bush is holding fast to his rejection of mandatory curbs on greenhouse gases that are blamed for global warming, despite a new report from 300 scientists in the United States and seven other nations that indicates Arctic temperatures are rising.

This week, a four-year study of the Arctic will document that the region is warming rapidly, affecting global climates.

Scientists project that industrial gases such as carbon dioxide will make the Arctic warmer still, which would raise the level of the seas and make the earth hotter. The world's atmosphere includes about 380 parts per million of carbon dioxide, compared with 280 parts per million in 1800, according to scientists.

President Vladimir Putin of Russia signed the Kyoto international climate treaty last week, which puts it into effect early next year without US participation. The treaty requires industrial nations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases below 1990 levels.

''President Bush strongly opposes any treaty or policy that would cause the loss of a single American job, let alone the nearly 5 million jobs Kyoto would have cost," said James Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

Headed into his second term, Bush continues to believe he ''made the right leadership choice" by repudiating the UN-sponsored pact negotiated in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, Connaughton said.

Bill Clinton's vice president, Al Gore, negotiated the treaty for the United States and had a major role in its final form.

''Kyoto was a bad treaty for the United States," said Mike Leavitt, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Leavitt added in an interview Friday that climate change is not an issue the administration dismisses. ''I know that it is of importance to the president that we continue to make progress," he said.

Bush's policy has amounted to spending a few billion dollars each year on research.

White House officials contend the drastic cuts in pollution that the treaty would have imposed on the United States would have cost nearly $400 billion and almost 5 million jobs. Many would have shifted to other countries that were not obligated to reduce pollution levels, the Bush administration says.

From 1990 to 2002, US greenhouse gases increased 13.1 percent while Russian greenhouse gases decreased 38.5 percent, partly because of shrinkage in its industrial base after the collapse of the Soviet Union, according to the latest UN figures.

Global warming is a recurring theme that punctuated the start of Bush's terms in office.

In March 2001 Bush broke his campaign promise to regulate carbon emissions and withdrew the United States from the Kyoto treaty, which seeks to slow global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Gore signed the treaty in 1997, but it was not ratified by the Republican-controlled Senate. Bush said the treaty should have included developing countries such as China and India, which are major polluters.

Achieving the treaty's target will be difficult without participation by the United States, which accounted for 36 percent of the industrialized nations' carbon dioxide emissions in 1990. Russia accounted for 17 percent.

Critics say Bush's opposition is ironic because the treaty was modeled after the market-based US program for cutting acid rain created in 1990 by Bush's father and often pointed to by the current administration as a success story.

''Indeed, it would be very, very surprising if this instrument were not used by the people who invented it," Klaus Toepfer, executive director of the Kenya-based UN Environment Program, said in an interview.

Annie Petsonk, a lawyer for Environmental Defense, a nonprofit group based in New York, said the United States will be left isolated on the biggest environmental challenge of the century.

The Pew Center on Global Climate Change is releasing a report this week that says there is strong evidence that climate change has begun to affect ecosystems and wildlife in the United States and around the world. Some animal species are moving from one habitat to another to adapt to warmer temperatures, according to the Pew report, and future warming probably will exceed the ability of many species to migrate or adjust.

IN TODAY'S GLOBE
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
 
Today (free)
Yesterday (free)
Past 30 days
Last 12 months
 Advanced search / Historic Archives