Back home

SectionsTodaySponsored by:
Latest coverage Second man charged in U.S. embassy attack

US charges one suspect in bombing

Prior Coverage
Missile strike strains fragile US-Pakistan tie

Terror figure's family has benign ties in US

Bomb kills 1, hurts 25 at Cape Town eatery

Japan cult may have used agent found in Sudan

Heightened security signals wariness of terror

Taliban report vow by Saudi tied to blasts

Arab League calls missile attacks "blatant violation"

Assets frozen
US targets terrorist wealth

Detainees speak
3 reportedly tell of embassy plot

Prepared to die
At rally, Sudan leader invokes holy war

Flashpoints Elsewhere
The other US foreign-policy hurdles

Hardening Policy
US adopts Israeli tactics

Local Response
Wagging dog? Fine, some say

News Analysis
A hectic period that left a lasting skepticism

Vacation Redux
Clinton flies back to his haven on Vineyard

Afghans, Sudanese denounce attacks

US responses to terrorism

Saudi exile vows 'war' on US

Security levels raised across US

US calls terrorists' losses significant

Security at monument is tightened

Pakistan multinational staff says they feel threatened

Egypt says it not involved in strikes on Sudan

Sudanese mob British embassy in Khartoum

Reports dull success of strikes

Arab world enraged by attacks

Pakistan says missile didn't land on soil

Most Americans approve of Clinton's decision

More than 70 protest in Boston

Angry Sudanese storm embassy

Security tight in NY, Boston

US hits "terrorist facilities" in Afghanistan, Sudan

At home, timing of move appears suspect to some

Rapid retaliation departure for US

Allies back US strikes

With 2d address, a different Clinton

Friends register backing; foes, fury

The weapon
Tomahawk missiles' accuracy is improved

Religious zeal supplanting politics as motive

An attack project born amid turmoil

Quick, need rewrite! A vacation hiatus surprises press

Culture of cynicism makes comparisons to movie inevitable

The right response to terrorists

With 2d address, a different Clinton

Elusive Saudi main suspect in US bomb probe

The Air Strikes


The attack on Sudan

The attack on Afghanistan

Out Front
(Associated Press)

"Islamic Int'l" now in sights of a superpower

Prominent Arab militants from Afghanistan

Militancy has many names

From the CIA


President Clinton

Military leaders

Briefing by Defense Secretary Cohen and Gen. Shelton

Associated Press, 08/20/98

Cohen: As you've already heard from President Clinton, we have today conducted military strikes at several facilities that have supported international terrorist groups.

The United States and the rest of the community of civilized nations have made it clear time and time again that the violence and the bloodshed and the murderous acts of international terrorists will not be tolerated.

Today's military strikes against those terrorists' camps and facilities are part of a continuing effort to defend U.S. citizens and interests abroad against the very real threat posed by international terrorists.

In the wake of the tragic and treacherous attacks on our embassies in East Africa, and in light of the continuing patterns of specific threats against U.S. citizens and facilities, we've taken these actions to reduce the ability of these terrorist organizations to train and equip their misguided followers or to acquire weapons of mass destruction for their use in campaigns of terror.

We recognize that these strikes will not eliminate the problem, but our message is clear. There will be no sanctuary for terrorists, and no limit to our resolve to defend American citizens and our interests, our ideals of democracy and law against these cowardly attacks.

Those who attack our people will find no safe place, no refuge from the long arm of justice.

General Shelton is going to provide you with as much operational detail as we can on the facilities that have been struck, but I need to forewarn you: There will not be much operational detail provided. We are engaged in a difficult confrontation with the forces of international terrorism, the unique nature of the terrorist threat, the lack of regard for international law, the willingness to specifically target innocent civilians, transnational operations which defy traditional means of influence.

All of these factors and more have forced us to adopt some very different approaches to the problem. And therefore, we do not intend to provide, at least for now, the specific numbers or units of U.S. military forces that have been involved, nor will we discuss the specific weapons and tactics employed in these strikes.

And with that, General Shelton will give you some details about the facilities that we targeted and why they were chosen.

Question: Can you just briefly tell us at least whether these were air strikes or missile (off microphone)?

Cohen's response: General Shelton is going to give you a brief summation of what targets were attacked.

Shelton: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Good afternoon. First, let me underscore what Secretary Cohen has said. This is not simply a response to some specific act, but a concerted effort to defend U.S. citizens and our interests around the globe against a very real and a very deadly terrorist threat.

As many of you are aware, our intelligence community has provided us with convincing information based on a variety of intelligence sources, that in Osama bin Laden's network of terrorists was involved in the planning, the financing and the execution of the attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, attacks that killed over 300 people, including 12 Americans and wounded thousands more.

This is by no means the first time the bin Laden network has been connected to terrorist attacks. Bin Laden himself has admitted to attempting to kill American servicemen on their way to and serving in our humanitarian missions to Somalia in 1992.

His supporters and followers have tried to assassinate the president of Egypt, and even the pope. And as recently as three months ago, bin Laden, himself, repeated his fatwah against Americans, and ordered to attack American and our allies throughout the world, and to make no distinction between military and civilians, including women and children.

The facilities we struck today in Afghanistan and Sudan, are important parts of the bin Laden network of terrorists groups. At 1:30 p.m. EDT simultaneous military strikes were carried out against known terrorist training faculties in remote regions of Afghanistan and an industrial facility in Khartoum, Sudan.

The targets selected and the timing of the strikes, 7:30 p.m. in Sudan, and 10 p.m. in Afghanistan, were part of our overall effort to minimize collateral damage at the sites.

Now, if I can direct your attention to these photo boards.

Shelton: The three facilities in Afghanistan we struck are the Aswa Kali al-Bader (phonetic) base camp, training camp and support complex.

A number of terrorist groups are associated with these facilities, including bin Laden's al-Kadar ph), the Armed Islamic Group, and the Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

These bases provide refuge for terrorists, house the infrastructure for their funding international travel, and are used to train terrorists in the tactics and weapons of international terrorism.

The base camp is the main headquarters facility for the complex, and it includes storage, housing, training and administration facilities for the complex. It is also the key command and control node.

The support camp is the primary logistics area for the complex, and includes storage for a large amount of weapons and ammunition.

The four primary training camps, one of which is shown here, are used for training terrorist tactics, indoctrination, weapons and the use of improvised explosive devices.

Within the camp are numerous structures - tent stands, obstacle courses, firing ranges and burned areas for explosive testing and training.

The bulwark of the west camp is indicative of the camp characteristics in general, and includes evidence of continuing expansion of the facilities.

We have also had convincing information that, for some time, the bin Laden network has been actively seeking to acquire weapons of mass destruction, including chemical weapons, for use against U.S. citizens and our interests around the world.

This next spread out is for the Shifa (phonetic) Chemical Complex in northeast Khartoum, Sudan.

The intelligence community is confident that this facility is involved in the production of chemical weapons agents, including precursor chemicals for deadly V Series of nerve agents like, for example, VX.

We also know that bin Laden has extensive ties to the Sudanese government, which controls this chemical facility. Before taking your questions, let me emphasize that although we are confident that on some bin Laden's network was involved in the criminal attack on embassies and the murder of more than 300 innocent victims, the actions we have taken today should not be viewed simply as retaliation for those attacks.

Rather, as the president and as Secretary Cohen have said, this has been an exercise of self defense against an imminent and continuing terrorist threat. There can be no safe haven for terrorists.

The international community must not tolerate such acts nor accept those nations who would aid or harbor terrorists. We owe it to our citizens and to the citizens of all law-abiding nations to do all that we can to prevent terrorist actions and to prevent - bring those responsible for spreading hate and death to justice. And with that, Secretary Cohen and I will take your questions.

Question: Mr. Secretary, could you tell us, does this just involve U.S. strikes or missiles strikes or will troops actually put on the ground, albeit temporarily ...?

Cohen's response: Well, for the time being, we are not going to discuss this in view of the fact that there may be other operations that might be required and we do not want to place any of our forces in any kind of jeopardy or compromising position. So for the time being, we're going to simply indicate that strikes were carried and then we will, at a later time, discuss that.

Question: Were these brief strikes? Are they still going on or have the strikes ended?

Cohen's response: The strikes should have ended.

Question: Mr. Secretary, what are the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden right now? Do you believe that you killed him in these strikes?

Cohen's response: I have no idea where he is at this time. And we were - designed this operation to attack his infrastructure, and that's precisely what we have done.

Question: Do you know whether he was in any of these facilities when the strikes occurred?

Cohen's response: We do not know.

Question: What were some of barometers ...

Cohen's response: That's not our design. Our design was to take down this structure which is responsible for training hundreds if not thousands of terrorists.

Question: What were some of the barometers of success here on the plant and also on the plant's total destruction - part (phonetic)? Can you give us a sense?

Cohen's response: Our plan was to attack these sites with sufficient power to certainly disrupt them and hopefully destroy them. Some of these are solid structures, other are less so. But we believe that given the targeting that was done with the capability that was unleashed, it would cause sufficient damage to disrupt them for some time.

Question: Were there U.S. casualties in those raids?

Cohen's response: Not to our knowledge, no.

Question: Have you had any (off microphone) yet?

Cohen's response: Too early to make that assessment just yet.

Question: Could you also clarify, was it one training camp? I believe you said there were four.

Shelton's response: There are a total of four training camps. All four were hit. We only addressed one of those today.

Question: So is it correct, then, that it's seven sites in Afghanistan, essentially (off microphone)?

Shelton's response: Within the one complex - that make up the one complex, yes.

Question: Could you tell us where this is in Afghanistan generally?

Shelton's response: It's basically about 94 miles south of Kabul. Proximity to the - Tom, proximity to the Afghan border?

(Unidentified spokesman): It's just a few kilometers ...

Shelton's response: To the Pakistani border.

(Unidentified spokesman): A few kilometers to Pakistan border. It's in this part of Afghanistan right here.

Question: Did Pakistan provide permission for overflight, or were they - did they participate in any way?

Cohen's response: Well, we're not going to discuss any operational details of this.

Question: Did any other country take part in these raids, or was it just the United States?

Cohen's response: No. This was simply the United States.

Question: Is this your - in Khartoum is that a residential area that that's near? What sort of area is that?

Shelton's response: In Khartoum, the target was located in an industrial complex area. It is - there are surrounding facilities. We did everything we possibly could to minimize the collateral damage associated with that. But it is in an industrial area. And so we would anticipate very minimal numbers of collateral damage.

Question: When did you get the first sense to plan this to execution? Are we talking nine or 10 hours or two days?

Cohen's response: We began - as you know, it was just a week ago today that all of us, certainly the chairman and myself, were out at Andrews Air Force Base welcoming home the bodies of 10 Americans who died in the bombings. We indicate at that time with our words and now we're indicating with our deeds that American citizens were not going to be allowed to be attacked with impunity.

From that moment forward, certainly, we intensified the information gathering to try and track down those responsible for this terrorist action. It's been a combination of sources of information from a variety of places that led us to the conclusion that Osama bin Laden's terror network was associated and responsible for this bombing. Our effort was to try to target those facilities and infrastructure that allow him to continue to train terrorists to carry out terrorist operations.

Cohen's response: In addition, as the chairman has just said, we also had some very compelling information as far as threats against other Americans. And a combination of the attacks that were made, coupled with the threat of future attacks to come, certainly intensified our effort to target these facilities.

Question: Are you at all concerned, Mr. Secretary, that these strikes may in fact provoke retaliation somewhere? May meaning encourage more aggressive terrorist actions?

Cohen's response: It has been a long history of terrorist actions directed against innocent American people. We believe that a number of other terrorist activities and plans were underway. We have an absolute obligation, indeed a duty, and we'd be derelict in that duty if we did not take action to interrupt those plans and to try to insulate American people, and our friends from these activities.

So, I am satisfied that this action will help prevent some of those plans from being carried forward. But they were determined to carry forward more terrorist actions. And so, by us taking action now, we hope to prevent more Americans from dying in the future.

Question: Were the forces involved U.S.-based forces or where they from - operating out of third countries?

Cohen's response: Let me just say, they're U.S. forces. OK.

Question: The other plans - the other things that were being planned, do they also involve truck bombings or there was an allusion to chemical weapons. Did any of them involve the use of - or planned use of chemical weapons?

Cohen's response: It was - the information that we had led us to the conclusion that future activities, terrorist activities were planned.

It was not specific in terms of whether it would be a bomb or other types of terrorist actions, so that's not something that we would try to be driven by. But we anticipated there could be future truck bombs, as we saw in the past cases. And so we took this action to, again, interrupt the training of these types of activities.

Secondly, we had information that led us to believe that Osama bin Laden and his organization were, indeed, trying to acquire chemical weapons and to utilize them in future activities.

Question: (off microphone) have chemical weapons?

Cohen's response: We don't know that at this point. What we do know is the facility that was targeted in Khartoum produced the precursor chemicals that would allow the production of the type of VX nerve agent that has been talked about at some length.

Question: Was that facility - was that facility being used to assist terrorists with the knowledge of the Sudanese government?

Cohen's response: You'll have to ask the Sudanese government on that account. We do know that he's had an association in the past with the Sudanese government. We do know that he has had some financial interest in contributing to the - this particular facility. Whether or not it's with the full knowledge of the Sudanese government remains to be determined.

Question: Mr. Secretary, I came in late, so I apologize if this question has been asked. Some Americans are going to say this bears a striking resemblance to ''Wag the Dog.'' Two questions: Have you seen the movie. And second, how do you respond to people who think that?

Cohen's response: The only motivation driving this action today was our absolute obligation to protect the American people from terrorist activities.

That is the sole motivation. No other consideration has been involved. The chairman and I have worked with others for the past week night and day, working with the community, our intelligence community, and working with others. The only factors involved were to prevent the kind of terrorist action that killed 12 Americans last week and injured so many hundreds, and indeed thousands, more. And that is the only factor under consideration.

Question: When did you know that you were going to make these strikes? How soon after the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania did you have sufficient intelligence to know you were going to strike? Second part - forgive me if you've covered this already, even though you won't say whether these were air strikes or what kind, did they come out of CENTCOM in the Middle East or come out of CONUS?

Cohen's response: I'm not going to discuss where they came out of. The planning has been underway for several days. We have been meeting, as I've indicated before, nearly around the clock for the past week -gathering information, satisfying ourselves in terms of who was responsible, which organization was linked to the terrorist bombings; also in trying to deal with the threats that were coming in fairly rapidly about more terrorist activities planned against Americans.

And so it's been an evolving process. Once we were satisfied, then the plans were worked up by our military.

Question: Mr. Secretary ...

Question: You said - I'm sorry - you said, seven strikes and up. It looks like - it looks like six sites because one is - there's an arrow leading to one site.

Shelton's response: There are a total - there's the base camp. There's the support facility itself, and a total of four training sites.

Question: I thought it was six.

Shelton's response: Six sites.

Question: Can you tell me - did you - what the chain of events was? Did the president order this strike? Or was it you? And when was that decision made?

Cohen's response: The president, as commander-in-chief, ordered the strikes.

Question: When was that?

Cohen's response: They were - during the course of the past 24 hours.

Question: Was this ...

Question: ... bin Laden himself part of it personally?

Cohen's response: No. We were targeting these facilities and his infrastructure.

Question: Was this (off microphone) by CENTCOM or Special Operations Com? Can you even say what CINC was in charge of this operation?

Shelton's response: We will not comment on the types of forces or types of platforms that we used in this for operational reasons. And I might add, I understand your frustration with the - you've got a job to do, and you'd like to know as much about the details as you can.

I have a job to do, and that is to ensure that whatever orders a commander-in-chief gives are carried out in a very effective matter. And secondly to ensure that we take care of the welfare of the men and women in uniform. I take that obligation very seriously.

After Desert Storm, as I recall very well, a lot of detail was put out about how we attacked different targets, things of this nature. We are in a different ball game today. This is a - we're going against a terrorist organization, and that calls from some different techniques.

Question: How close to weaponizing a chemical weapon was the Khartoum plant?

Cohen's response: That's a judgment that we can't make. We do know that this facility was used for the production of precursor chemicals that could be used for VX, producing VX.

Question: Mr. Secretary, could you say what evidence that, what the evidence was that convinced you that Osama bin Laden was behind these bombings?

Cohen's response: Well, as Ken indicated before, you're going to be given a briefing following these remarks of ours. But there's been a series of reports that we have analyzed, statements by Osama bin Laden himself, other information coming in as recently as yesterday about future attacks being planned against the United States.

Cohen's response: But we are satisfied there has been a convincing body of evidence that leads us to this conclusion.

Question: Is bin Laden a legitimate military target himself, personally?

Cohen's response: To the extent that he or his organization have declared war upon the United States or our interests, then he certainly is engaged in an act of war.

Question: Was there a specific threat that forced the act today?

Cohen's response: I'm sorry.

Question: Was there a specific threat that forced you to act today, rather than tomorrow or some other point?

Cohen's response: No, we have been planning this for several days now. We decided to go forward today.

Question: Do you believe this closes the pipeline on any imminent activity, or do you think something could still have...

Cohen's response: This doesn't foreclose anything. What we have prepared and have to be prepared for is a long continuing effort to deal with terrorism. We are sending a very strong signal that there is no safe haven. There's no safe place to hide. There is no refuge for terrorists who kill innocent American people. And that's the message that we're sending, and we will continue in that effort.

To the extent that other activities have been planned or indeed are carried out, they will be met with a continuing response on the part of the United States.

Question: General Shelton, can you comment on whether there was any resistance at all in these attacks?

Shelton's response: Resistance in terms of?

Question: Against our forces, I mean.

Shelton's response: No, that's an operational level of detail that I'd prefer not to share at this time.

Question: Did we get permission from Sudan and from Afghanistan to wage these? And did you notify the governments involved?

Cohen's response: Again, another operational matter that we're not going to discuss.

Question: Could you tell whether all services were involved?

Cohen's response: No, no.

Question: Can you say if there were any casualties among people at the camps in Sudan?

Cohen's response: It's too early to make any assessment at this point.

Question: How active were the camps in terms of training? Dormant, skeleton crews, or what can you say about that?

Cohen's response: They have been active for a period of time. And that activity continued through this week. They...

Question: Is there concerns about plume problems in Khartoum?

Cohen's response: We were, and the chairman can address that. But a detailed analysis was made and we're satisfied that there was low risk of collateral damage.

Question: General, could you say whether these camps involved hundreds of people, dozens, scores? Can you give us any rough estimate on the number of personnel involved on the ground approximately?

Shelton's response: In terms of the - intelligence has indicated that only occasion they were up to 600 that were in the one facility in Afghanistan.

Question: Which facility?

Shelton's response: At the - at - on - at different periods of time. And it has varied over time.

Question: Which facility, General?

Shelton's response: The complex itself.

Question: The whole six-site complex here?

Cohen's response: And it could range anywhere from zero to that amount. So there's now way of telling at this time.

Question: Were the imminent threats against other embassies or - or military bases...

Cohen's response: The answer's yes.

Question: ... military bases as well, U.S. military facilities?

Cohen's response: Well, that's something we always take into account that force protection is at the very top of the agenda as far as we're concerned when our forces are forward deployed.

And so, our military installations, all are potential targets of terrorists, so we take that into account. But these terrorists threats were more directed toward our embassies.

Question: Do you think that you can (off microphone) when some more information might be available on forces used in the next day or two? Is there any indication ...

Cohen's response: Say several days away.

Question: Are you keeping the forces on standby for follow-on action?

Cohen's response: The answer is we will have a capacity to conduct other operations, if - if we need to do so.

Question: General Shelton, you're going to be - the word assassination's going to come up that bin Laden is targeted for assassination. Under our current rules of war, can he - is he a legitimate military target?

Shelton's response: Tony, I think the best response I can give you that is his secretary has, as previously indicated - we were not going directly after Osama bin Laden. It is was an attack on his network of terrorist groups, as I think you can see from the targets.

And we will continue to go after that if we feel like it's appropriate and if the threats to Americans or American interests continue.

Question: Could you tell us again what the linkage was between the chemical plant in Khartoum and bin Laden (off microphone)?

Cohen's response: We do know that he had contributed to this particular facility. We do know that he had an interest in acquiring chemical weapons. We do know that this facility produces the precursors that can result in the production of VX. And that was a sufficient connection for us.

Question: Can you tell us if some of the additional terrorist plots provided by those individuals already taken into custody in relation to the Africa bombings?

Cohen's response: I'm sorry.

Question: Did we learn of some of these terrorist plots, the other threats out there, from the individuals already taken into custody in Kenya and Pakistan?

Cohen's response: No. We acquired the information from a variety of sources. And I believe the combination of those sources led us to this conclusion.

Question: Mr. Secretary, you stated here a couple of minutes ago that you wanted to send a signal that there is no safe haven, no place to hide for terrorists groups. Is that - does that represent a policy position that this administration has now embraced? And does that represent any break with the past?

Cohen's response: No. It's a consistent policy that we have had. If there are states who sponsor terrorism - acts of terrorism, they will be held accountable.

If there are individuals within states who have been given safe harbor, and who fail to either turn over individuals or provide an aiding and abetting of them, then this is a signal that they will not be beyond the reach of the United States.

To the extent that these terrorists continue to threaten to target Americans, then they cannot feel that they are immune simply because they are in some other country.

Transcribed by Federal Document Clearing House.


Advertising information

© Copyright 1998 Boston Globe Electronic Publishing, Inc.

Click here for assistance. Please read our user agreement.

Use to do business with the Boston Globe:
advertise, subscribe, contact the news room, and more.