Obama will propose 3-year freeze on federal spending

Move aims to ease public fears over mounting deficits

By Lori Montgomery
Washington Post / January 26, 2010

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

  • E-mail|
  • Print|
  • Reprints|
  • |
Text size +

WASHINGTON - Under mounting pressure to rein in mammoth budget deficits, President Obama will propose in his State of the Union address a three-year freeze on federal funding that is not related to national security, a concession to public concern about government spending that could dramatically curtail Obama’s legislative ambitions.

The freeze would take effect in October and limit the overall budget for agencies other than the military, veterans affairs, homeland security, and certain international programs to $447 billion a year for the remainder of Obama’s first term, senior administration officials said yesterday, imposing sharp limits on his ability to begin initiatives in education, the environment, and other areas of domestic policy.

Although the freeze would shave no more than $15 billion off next year’s budget - barely denting a deficit projected to exceed $1 trillion for the third year in a row - White House officials said it could save significantly more during the next decade.

They described the freeze as a critical component of a broader deficit reduction campaign intended to restore confidence in Obama’s ability to control the excesses of Washington and the most lavish aspirations of his own administration.

“You can’t afford to do everything that you might have always wanted to do. That’s the decision-making process that the president and the economic team went through,’’ said a senior administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe the speech the president will deliver tomorrow night. “We’re not here to tell you that we’ve solved the deficit. But you have to take steps to control spending.’’

The announcement comes less than a week after Massachusetts voters sent shock waves through the Democratic establishment by handing Republicans a crucial 41st seat in the Senate, endangering Obama’s agenda and fueling GOP attacks on Obama’s stewardship. After spending much of his first year in office pursuing expensive initiatives such as a far-reaching overhaul of the health care system, Obama has pledged to devote much of the next year to reducing record budget deficits, which have forced the Treasury Department to increase borrowing, driving the accumulated national debt toward levels not seen since World War II.

The spending freeze would affect only about one-eighth of the nation’s $3.5 trillion budget, the bulk of which is devoted to entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which are responsible for much of the future increase in spending. It would not restrain funding for the $787 billion economic stimulus package Obama pushed through Congress early last year, nor would it apply to a new bill aimed at creating jobs.

The House has approved a $156 billion package intended to lower the nation’s 10 percent unemployment rate, while the Senate is drafting an $80 billion package that includes tax cuts for businesses that hire new employees as well as aid for cash-strapped state governments and the unemployed.

It is also unlikely to affect the approximately $900 billion health care bill, which has been on life-support since the Massachusetts vote. In an interview with ABC News yesterday, Obama vowed to press ahead with health care and other items, even if doing so means jeopardizing his chances to be reelected in 2012.

“I’d rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president,’’ he said in the interview, according to an excerpt posted on ABC’s website.