|AT HOME IN CAPITAL
In a rare public appearance in Washington this past week, David Souter seemed at ease in front of his audience.
Retirement doesn't appear to be in the offing for Souter
WASHINGTON - For a guy who often can't wait to leave town and is said to be considering retirement, Supreme Court Justice David Souter gives the impression he's staying put for a while.
The 69-year-old Souter has not said a word about his plans, though he is widely considered to be among the justices who are more likely to retire soon.
In a rare public appearance in Washington this past week, Souter seemed at ease in front of his audience, including a bank of television cameras, and at home in the city he loves to hate. He offered advice about lobbying Congress and even oblique criticism of the Bush administration.
Talking about the importance of teaching history and the humanities in general, Souter displayed a warmth and wit that is at odds with his image as a Spartan, taciturn New Englander.
"Where history's understanding is missing, cynicism will take its place," Souter said at a meeting of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
The audience was made up largely of teachers and administrators in the humanities, although the cameras at the back of the room suggested there was more than academic interest in capturing the words and images of the most private justice.
With virtually no evidence to go on, it has become conventional wisdom in Washington that Souter is among the three justices most likely to retire soon. The others are his older colleagues on the court's liberal side - 88-year-old John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who turns 76 today. At an appearance in Boston on Friday, Ginsburg acknowledged the possibility that the court may get a new member soon.
Stevens has said repeatedly that he still enjoys the work and relatively light caseload. Ginsburg, a month removed from cancer surgery, has said she plans to serve into her 80s.
Souter has said nothing about staying or going. He claims to have the world's best job in the world's worst city and returns every summer to the same farmhouse in New Hampshire where he has lived for nearly 60 years.
Unlike the other eight justices, he has yet to hire law clerks for the term that begins in October. But then Souter always is among the last of the justices to select the young lawyers who will help him wade through the roughly 8,000 cases filed in a year.
He made one crack about his life in Washington the other day, noting that the demands of being a justice leave time for little else during the nine months that the justices hear and decide cases.
"When the term of court starts I undergo a sort of annual intellectual lobotomy and it lasts until the following summer when I sort of cram what I can into the summertime," Souter said to laughter.
His former law clerks say they try to appeal to Souter's sense of history to ensure he doesn't retire soon.
"We have suggested to him that history has put him in a place where he can be a force for good and that we would like him to continue to do that," said Kermit Roosevelt, a University of Pennsylvania law professor who worked for Souter in 1999 and 2000.
Souter was appointed to the court in 1990 by President George H.W. Bush, after just a few months as a federal appeals court judge, but with many years experience as a prosecutor, attorney general, trial judge and state Supreme Court justice in New Hampshire.
Virtually unknown outside his home state, he was viewed warily both by liberals and conservatives. Eighteen years later, Souter is firmly among the court's liberals. But he has resisted the spotlight that has attracted liberal and conservative justices alike.