WASHINGTON -- The government wasted millions of dollars in its award of post-Katrina Hurricane contracts for disaster relief, including at least $3 million for 4,000 beds that were never used, congressional auditors said yesterday.
The Government Accountability Office's review of 13 major contracts -- many of them awarded with limited or no competition after the Aug. 29 hurricane -- offers the first preliminary overview of their soundness.
Waste and mismanagement were widespread due to poor planning and miscommunication, according to the five-page briefing paper released yesterday. That led to money being paid for services, such as housing or ice, that were never used.
''The government's response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita depended heavily on contractors to deliver ice, water, and food supplies; patch rooftops; and provide housing to displaced residents," said the report by the GAO, Congress's auditing arm. ''FEMA did not adequately anticipate needs."
Nicol Andrews, a spokeswoman for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said the agency was working hard to improve its awarding of billions of dollars in government contracts as it prepares for the next hurricane season, which begins June 1.
''We have been working with [Homeland] Secretary [Michael] Chertoff to incorporate unprecedented levels of oversight in FEMA contracting," she said. ''However, in the event of a disaster, when minutes count, we have the authority to do what it takes to move quickly."
By and large, the initial criticism of FEMA from members of Congress and others was that the agency moved slowly to assist hurricane victims.
Of more than 700 contracts valued at $500,000 or greater, more than half were awarded without full competition or with open-ended terms, including politically connected companies such as Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root, Bechtel Corp., and AshBritt Inc.
Democrats, in particular, in recent weeks have called for limits on no-bid agreements, which they say have been awarded to politically influential companies at the expense of a slow Gulf Coast rebuilding effort.
''Previous reports of waste in the aftermath of Katrina have been bad, but this one is worse," said Representative Henry A. Waxman of California, the top Democrat on the House Government Reform Committee.
''The Bush administration has learned nothing from its disastrous contract management in Iraq," he said. ''The administration seems incapable of spending money in a way that actually meets the needs of Gulf Coast residents."
Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said the GAO report reveals ''a serious, ongoing problem" in contracting that requires more stringent oversight.
''Taxpayer dollars will be spent for years to come on Katrina response and recovery, and investigations of corruption and mismanagement are still in their early stages," said Lieberman. ''Government auditors and prosecutors must redouble their efforts."
The GAO report released yesterday speaks broadly and does not address the validity of no-bid contracts; those reviews are being conducted by inspectors general at Homeland Security and other agencies. But it found significant problems in its general review of the 13 contracts, most of which were awarded without full competition.
According to the report, the GAO praised government agencies for their ''hard work" in securing contracts after the disaster, but said millions could have been saved if they had adopted previous GAO recommendations to hire more people, prearrange contracts, and improve staff training.
Among the findings: