Nonpartisan study tabs cost of wars at $4 trillion

Washington Post / July 1, 2011

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Text size +

WASHINGTON - Amid a growing debate over how to reduce the government’s debt, a study has concluded that US involvement in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan has cost up to $4 trillion over the past decade.

The study, by the nonpartisan Eisenhower Research Project based at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International Studies, also estimates that at least 225,000 people, including civilians, troops, and insurgents, have died as a result of the conflicts. Of that number, an estimated 6,000 were uniformed US military personnel.

Pentagon spending accounts for only half of the budgetary costs incurred and represents a fraction of the full economic cost of the wars, according to the study. Among other line items, the study’s contributors - more than 20 economists, political scientists, and other specialists - estimate federal obligations to care for past and future veterans will eventually total $600 billion to $950 billion.

The estimates are based on reports from the Congressional Budget Office, the Congressional Research Service, and myriad other sources.

The $4 trillion estimate could be fodder for lawmakers increasingly concerned that the United States can ill-afford to maintain a large military presence in Afghanistan. The study’s authors say that is a debate worth having.

“Some people will say that’s an expensive price tag, but what we’re trying to do makes it worth it. Other people will say we can’t afford it,’’ Catherine Lutz, codirector of the “Costs of War’’ project, said in an interview. top stories on Twitter

    waiting for twitterWaiting for Twitter to feed in the latest...