Religious boundaries being tested in the Hamptons

A rabbi's petition divides a town

By Frank Eltman
Associated Press / October 3, 2008
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

WESTHAMPTON BEACH, N.Y. - They are largely invisible, sometimes as simple as a small, plastic marker affixed to a utility pole. There's one around the White House and one in Manhattan that sprawls from the East River to the Hudson.

Now, in a village at the gateway to the Hamptons, the eastern Long Island playground for the ultrarich, a battle has erupted over this religious symbol for Orthodox Jews, pitting them against their more secular neighbors.

Rabbi Marc Schneier, who counts Governor David Paterson of New York among his friends, wants the Westhampton Beach mayor and village board to approve the placement of the religious boundary, called an eruv, which would allow observant Jews to perform minor tasks on their Sabbath or on religious holidays like Rosh Hashana, which was observed this week.

The proposal has stirred controversy among the 2,000 full-time residents of Westhampton Beach, a community 75 miles east of Manhattan whose population can grow to 20,000 in the summer. Mayor Conrad Teller says 85 percent of village residents oppose the eruv, and several groups have sprung up to fight it, including one called Jewish People Opposed to the Eruv.

"The objection to the eruv has nothing to do with religion, per se," group chairman Arnold Sheiffer, a semiretired advertising executive, said in an interview. "What they object to is creating a division in the village where none ever existed."

Formed in late August, the group has collected about $30,000 and enlisted 150 residents to fight the proposal, said Sheiffer, who has lived here for 30 years. The group's intention, he said, is to blunt talk that anyone opposed to the eruv is anti-Semitic.

"We've always lived in peace and harmony," Sheiffer said. "The truth is, I didn't know if people were Jewish or not. And the truth is I didn't really care. And it was nice. Now we have this thing, this eruv, that would create divisions."

Community opposition to the establishment of an eruv is hardly unique to Westhampton Beach.

A group of Orthodox Jews in Tenafly, N.J., won a six-year battle in 2006 to create one. A federal judge had ruled the borough had the right to ban the eruv, but an appeals court disagreed, saying the borough had selectively enforced the ban on utility pole attachments. The US Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

An eruv was established in a north London suburb in 2002 after a decade-long battle in which opponents claimed it would create a religious ghetto in the leafy, well-heeled neighborhood.

The eruv is considered a necessity for Orthodox Jews, who are forbidden by Jewish law to perform any activity considered work on the Sabbath or religious holidays. Without one, they say, they are unable to perform simple tasks like pushing strollers or carrying packages.

Schneier applied to the village for permission to erect an eruv but withdrew his petition earlier this year as the controversy began to build. He said he intends to refile his request sometime this fall but declined to say when.

Opponents worry that if the eruv is established, Westhampton Beach may evolve into an Orthodox enclave.

The mayor, who declined to take a position on the eruv because he may eventually have to vote on it, believes those fears are overblown. He said the village has retained an attorney to research the constitutional issues.

Another opposition group, the Alliance for the Separation of Church and State in the Greater Westhampton Area, also has hired an attorney.

Its lawyer, Mark Williams, says the alliance is concerned that village approval would amount to sanctioning a particular religion, and is unconstitutional.

Rabbi Marc Schneier sought permission to erect an eruv

but withdrew his petition as

the controversy began to build.


  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Save this article
  • powered by
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.