boston.com your connection to The Boston Globe

Web-based boycotters tread carefully

Threat of action often more potent

CHICAGO -- Pick a cause and join a boycott.

Tackling corporate America these days on issues ranging from triple-X video sales to taking Christmas out of Christmas can be as easy as clicking on a website. But whether the campaigns do any real damage is hard to measure, experts say.

Even one of the most active boycott organizers, the American Family Association, says there is evidence the threat of a boycott may be more potent than the action itself.

''Everyone's afraid to be bitten by a snake, but the fear can be much worse than the bite," says Randy Sharp, the association's director of special projects. ''Our policy is that before you call a boycott you do everything in your power to avoid it. They're costly and time-consuming. You take the easy road first and work with the companies in private."

The conservative Christian group claims it has 2.2 million online supporters, though Sharp said little is known about their demographics, and it is hard to know how they carry through on an actual boycott.

Last week the association canceled a boycott against Target Corp. after the company said it would use the word ''Christmas" in its advertising and marketing, instead of something more holiday generic. The group claimed 700,000 people had signed up electronically to boycott Target.

It is happy with a recent decision by Ford Motor Co. to pull some advertising from gay publications after it called off a boycott threat against the auto maker for being too gay-friendly.

Ford said it was responding to a fall in US sales in all but two of the last 18 months and was not caving into pressure.

But a nine-year boycott of the Walt Disney Co. -- called by the Family Association and backed by churches and others to protest health benefits to same-sex partners and special days for gays at theme parks -- may be a different story.

''It had very little effect," said Roberta Clarke, a professor at the Boston University School of Management. Disney, she said, had nine record years during the nine years of boycott.

''In the case of Disney there was no alternative. But in the Ford case, are there substitutes? There sure are," she said. In any case, Ford ''killed two birds with one stone. They had to do the cutbacks anyway, and they at least gave the appearance of appeasing the AFA."

Each company is different in terms of the way a boycott would impact them, she added, but today's pressure groups are probably not as effective as unions were in their early US organizing days.

Then, ''It was more than values," she said. ''If they called a boycott, then they had to do it. But these are not unions. They are not tied together by a common employer or industry," she said.

''I don't think there is any evidence to say that boycotts are particularly effective. All these groups do is alter reality and make people think they're effective," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the largest US gay and lesbian group.

''What we've been doing is trying to flex our financial muscle," he said, by trying to harness the gay community's spending power. That is estimated at between $400 million and $600 million annually by Florida-based Simmons Market Research Bureau.

SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
 
Today (free)
Yesterday (free)
Past 30 days
Last 12 months
 Advanced search / Historic Archives