A monster's tale

Ancient and unloved, sea lampreys plaguing Lake Champlain

By David Filipov
Globe Staff / November 9, 2008
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

BURLINGTON, Vt. -The ancient creature attaches itself to the body of its prey with the rasp-like teeth lining its jawless maw, punctures the skin with its chisel of a tongue, and then slowly sucks out the victim's blood.

This 20-inch monster, the sea lamprey, is the subject of endless fascination for scientists: an eel-like fish that evolved in the ocean tens of millions of years before the first dinosaurs, but is thriving today in freshwater Lake Champlain. It has become so abundant in these waters that it is wreaking havoc on the salmon and trout prized by people who fish the 120-mile long lake.

There isn't a fisherman on the lake without a story: once-prized catches that are now bizarrely scrawny; fish marred by distinctive bull's-eye wounds; salmon and trout that are pulled up from the lake with live sea lampreys hanging off them like sinister-looking streamers.

How the sea lampreys got there, how humans unwittingly contributed to their proliferation, and whether they should be eradicated or venerated are questions that have spawned acrimonious discussion in Vermont. Underlying the debate are larger questions: Whether, and how, humans should reconstruct ecosystems that our ancestors altered.

One person's invasive menace is another's biological wonder, even though no one denies, as one environmentalist put it, that sea lampreys are "hard to love," or, as a fisheries official said, they're "not like baby seals." In part, the debate turns on whether the sea lamprey has been in the lake for thousands of years, or whether it arrived much more recently, and with human help.

As the sea lamprey population has grown, Vermont has been expanding its effort to control it.

On Friday, a team of biologists poured a yellow-brown chemical known as TFM into the Missisquoi River from a dam in the rustic town of Swanton, about 6 miles south of the border with Canada. The concoction kills lamprey larvae on the silty bottom where the river flows into Lake Champlain.

It was the latest in a series of treatments of the lake's tributaries, said Bradley Young, fishery biologist with the Lake Champlain office of the US Fish and Wildlife Service. He said the lampricide represents the most effective way to end the reign of an invasive species that could be costing the state millions in lost revenue from tourism and fishing.

"We can kiss goodbye salmonid fishing in Lake Champlain," Young said. "Or we can help restore a healthy ecosystem, and have a healthy fishery."

In the ocean, the sea lamprey is a parasite that grows up to 3 feet long and feeds on the bodily fluids of fish many times larger than itself, but leaves them alive and healthy. Lake Champlain sea lampreys are smaller - up to 20 inches long - but so are the fish they prey on. In the Great Lakes, where sea lampreys also live, studies have shown that the mortality rate for fish they attack is between 40 and 60 percent.

Some in Vermont say that in pumping pesticides into the lake, humans are meddling where they do not belong. They say sea lampreys might have been in Lake Champlain since the last ice age. They suggest that humans have made the visually unattractive creature an ecological scapegoat for their failure to restore the population of salmon and trout after overfishing in previous centuries wiped out the native strains of these fish. And they say lampricide threatens other endangered species in the lake.

"If you believe the sea lamprey has been here 10,000 years, it's been playing a part in the ecosystem," said Mollie Matteson, conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity, a Tucson-based environmental nonprofit that has an office in Richmond, Vt. "At a gut, irrational level, people are just really repelled by them. It's really hard to love a blood-sucking, eel-like creature."

Eric Palmer, director of fisheries for the state Department of Fish and Wildlife, says that the treatments do kill native species of freshwater lampreys, which do not prey on large fish. But the lampricide causes minimal harm to other species, he said: After treatments, fisheries biologists generally find that the lampricide kills only handfuls of fish, compared with tens of thousands of lamprey larvae.

"Our concern is not to kill sea lampreys, it's to restore a balance on the lake," he said.

Vermont's sensitivity about the lake's habitat reflects a broader reconsideration of the role humans have played in shaping it. If the sea lamprey is invasive, it probably made its way into the lake through man-made canals, the way it arrived in the Great Lakes. But recent research suggests that the Lake Champlain sea lamprey is genetically distinct from the ocean species, and may have entered the lake as the glaciers receded 10,000 years ago.

If this is true, the eradication by humans of native strains of fish, which may have been better adapted to survive alongside sea lampreys, helped cause the current imbalance. Deforestation and cultivation of the land filled the lake's tributaries with sediment that made them better suited for lamprey larvae to survive. Since fisheries began restocking the lake with nonnative strains of trout and salmon in the 1970s, the sea lamprey population, judging from the number of wounds on fish, has skyrocketed.

"We're feeding the lampreys by restocking their favorite food," said Ellen Marsden, a biology professor at the University of Vermont who has researched sea lampreys. "And we're competing for the same fish."

Local fishermen willingly share tales of a lamprey-infested lake. At Datillio's Sunoco, a gas station in South Burlington with a well-stocked hunting and fishing section that is somewhat of a hangout for outdoorsmen, Bill Kirkpatrick described catching "pencil-thin" trout with numerous, bloody suction wounds.

"We used to catch 100 trout in a morning," pitched in Reg Hawthorne. "Now, we're lucky to find 15 to 20, and they're all scrawny."

Richard Greenough, owner of the 28-foot charter boat Sure Strike II, says Vermont has been too timid in controlling the sea lampreys.

"We could have a world-class fishery but the state doesn't want it," said Greenough at his home in Essex, adding that his business did not do well this past summer.

Vermont and New York both started using lampricide to control sea lampreys in 1990. But when federal funding ended in 1997, only New York could afford to continue the treatments. Vermont rejoined the effort in 2002. But Vermont, which lists more endangered species in its tributaries than New York does on its side of the lake, uses a lower concentration of lampricide in most streams. As the sea lampreys have expanded their territory, New York has been quicker to respond with expanded treatment, because Vermont requires more time, and more public involvement, to issue permits to apply lampricide to tributaries.

Even as Vermont fisheries officials work to speed up the permitting process, scientists are divided over whether expanding the use of lampricide will work. Mike Winslow, a scientist with the Lake Champlain Committee, a nonprofit advocacy group, says the best evidence available - scientists count the wounds on trout and salmon pulled from the lake, because the sea lampreys are too numerous to count - is inconclusive. Winslow says it is also possible that sea lampreys have begun adapting to the constant use of lampricide, the way some other nuisance species respond to repeated poisoning.

"The fishery isn't improving, there are no economic benefits, and we still sacrifice nontargets," he said. "The program is not working despite all its promise."

But Brian Chipman, the fisheries biologist for the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife who oversaw the use of lampricide in the Missisquoi on Friday and in the Winooski River last month, said recent inspections of the lake have turned up "very few wounds on the fish compared to the last few years."

Young, of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, cited economic studies suggesting that a healthy fishery in Lake Champlain could inject over $200 million into the local economy through tourism and commercial fishing. He said no conservation project can return the lake to its previous habitat, but controlling the sea lamprey population will help restore the balance.

"There are some people in Vermont who think it's going to be a Norman Rockwell painting forever," said Young. "It all comes down to whether you think that people are part of the ecosystem or not."

David Filipov can be reached at

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Save this article
  • powered by
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.