Vt. inmates take state to court over unsavory Nutraloaf

A sampling of Nutraloaf from the cafeteria of Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in South Burlington, Vt. A sampling of Nutraloaf from the cafeteria of Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in South Burlington, Vt. (Andy Duback/Associated Press)
Email|Print|Single Page| Text size + By Wilson Ring
Associated Press / March 23, 2008

MONTPELIER - Savory it isn't: It's made of whole wheat bread, nondairy cheese, raw carrots, spinach, seedless raisins, beans, vegetable oil, tomato paste, powdered milk, and dehydrated potato flakes.

To prison officials, it's a complete meal. To inmates, it's a food so awful, they'd rather go hungry than eat it.

In the latest legal battle over the prison cafeteria standard known as Nutraloaf, the Vermont Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether it's punishment or a method of behavior modification.

On Monday, the court will hear arguments in a class-action suit brought by inmates who say it's punishment and that anyone subjected to it should get a formal disciplinary process first.

"It's commonplace in other states as a way of providing nutrition in a mechanism that dissuades inmates from throwing feces, urine, trays, and silverware," said Corrections Commissioner Rob Hofmann.

"It tends to have the desired outcome," Hofmann said. "Once the offender relents, we stop with the Nutraloaf. That's our goal, to protect our staff and not have them subjected to behavior that the average Vermonter would find incomprehensible."

Seth Lipschutz, an attorney with Vermont's Prisoner's Rights office, says the state has a legitimate interest in changing the behavior of inmates who misbehave.

But he says a diet of Nutraloaf is punishment, plain and simple. To call it anything else is "playing with words to get what they want. It's wrong and it's sad," he said.

"If it's punishment, you've got to follow the rules," Lipschutz said. "Even in prison you get a little bit of due process."

Nutraloaf and its equivalents have been used for decades in prisons across the country. In 1978, the US Supreme Court ruled that a substance used in Arkansas known as " 'grue' might be tolerable for a few days and intolerably cruel for weeks or months."

Since then, there have been numerous legal cases involving Nutraloaf or its equivalents. The Michigan Department of Corrections was involved in one of those cases, in which a federal judge ruled in 1988 that the use of Nutraloaf is punishment.

Now, Michigan inmates are only given Nutraloaf after going through the disciplinary process that lands them in segregation, said Department Spokesman Russ Marlan.

Occasionally, The National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union gets complaints about Nutraloaf from inmates, but it hasn't been involved in the group's litigation in years.

"Our position is that it shouldn't be used unless a violation has to do with food. It shouldn't be used as punishment," said Jody Kent, the Prison Project's public policy coordinator.

Vermont Assistant Attorney General Kurt Kuehl, who will argue the case for the Department of Corrections, said the other legal cases involving food loaf centered on whether the food was so bad it constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The courts have ruled it isn't, he said.

But the Vermont case is different because the use of Nutraloaf isn't punishment, according to the state. Kuehl says it is as if a correctional officer were to find an inmate with a knife. He wouldn't have to hold a hearing to take the knife away.

"It's taking an administrative action to protect the facility," said Kuehl.

Afterward, the inmate can be subject to a separate disciplinary hearing for the conduct that led to being fed Nutraloaf.

more stories like this

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Save this article
  • powered by
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.