N.H. asked to spend more on state parks

Panel urges other changes, as well

By Holly Ramer
Associated Press / November 24, 2009

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

  • E-mail|
  • Print|
  • Reprints|
  • |
Text size +

CONCORD, N.H. - New Hampshire could improve its state park system by reorganizing management and by inviting communities or volunteer groups to help maintain the land, but direct state funding is needed for true revitalization, according to a draft plan released yesterday.

New Hampshire’s park system, the only self-funded system in the country, relies on visitor fees from 74 parks, beaches, campgrounds, and ski areas to pay for its operation and maintenance.

But revenues have fallen short by an average of $400,000 a year since the funding model was adopted in 1991, and the system faces a $1.8 million deficit, said Ted Austin, director of the Division of Parks and Recreation.

In a letter attached to the 10-year development plan, Austin said he hopes the Legislature considers providing annual funding. He recommends a one-time allocation of $750,000 to replace equipment including chain saws and vehicles that won’t pass state inspection.

The plan also proposes creating three categories of parks: enterprise - well-developed parks that get lots of visitors and generate the most revenue; natural - largely undeveloped parks that generate little or no revenue; and classic - parks that fit somewhere in between.

The goal is to manage each group more efficiently, Austin said at a press conference yesterday. For example, enterprise parks would focus on generating more money with new recreational activities, while natural parks would focus on protecting resources and decreasing management expenses.

An earlier draft plan was rescinded by the state in July after public outcry over language that seemed to indicate a willingness to lease or sell 27 parks that produce no income.

George Bald, commissioner of the Department of Resources and Economic Development, acknowledged that the language was misleading but said the state never intended to sell the parks.

“I think we’re certainly going to look at partnerships, but the idea of us selling a park never was the intention, and it certainly isn’t in this [plan],’’ he said at a news conference.

Representative Leigh Webb, a member of the advisory council that worked on the plan, said state parks provide a service and should be supported by taxpayer money.

He said he hoped the rest of the Legislature would agree, but said it would be a tough sell in this economy.

“It’s very, very tough,’’ said Webb, Democrat of Franklin. “I have tempered my optimism with a little realism.’’

Four public hearings are scheduled in early December in Portsmouth, Concord, Peterborough, and Lancaster.

A final version of the plan is expected in early January.