The 'ticking-bomb' scenario, as an argument for torture, is potent. It is also silly, says one philosopher, and corrupt.
A SIMPLE THOUGHT experiment is able to show that Senator John McCain's staunch position against torture amounts to ''preening'' and ''pieties,'' writes the columnist Charles Krauthammer. Yet Jeremy Waldron, a philosopher and legal scholar at Columbia University, says the same thought experiment is ''at best silly and at worst corrupt.'' (Full article: 1076 words)
This article is available in our archives:
Purchase an electronic copy of the full article. Learn More
- $9.95 1 month archives pass
- $24.95 3 months archives pass
- $74.95 1 year archives pass