Little money, study devoted to oil spill cleanup technology
ON BARATARIA BAY, La. — While oil companies have spent billions of dollars to drill deeper and farther out to sea, relatively little money and research have gone into finding new, improved ways to respond to oil spills in deep-sea conditions like those in the Gulf of Mexico.
Specialists say the massive gulf spill has exposed a failure by the industry and the federal government to commit adequate resources to oil cleanup and response technology.
“Why they didn’t start working on it after the [Ixtoc 1] Mexican spill in 1979 is beyond me,’’ said Gerald Graham, president of Worldocean Consulting, an oil spill prevention and response planning firm in British Columbia. “Now they’re trying to catch up.’’
Only a fraction of the estimated 69 million to 131.5 million gallons of oil that have spewed into the gulf have been recovered. About 10 million gallons of oil have been burned off, and 25 million gallons of oil-water mix have been mopped up.
The mainstays of the two-month-long cleanup effort are oil booms, mechanical skimmers, and oil dispersants — the same tools used to fight the 1989
Improvements to these methods have been incremental and few new ones have been developed, critics say, because oil companies have no financial incentive.
“The technology rapidly advanced for drilling, because there was money to be made,’’ said Tim Robertson, general manager of Nuka Research & Planning, which specializes in oil spill response planning, and who worked on Seldovia, Alaska’s response during the Exxon spill. “There was nothing similar that applies to oil spill recovery.’’
Five companies —
But their spending on research for safety, accident prevention and spill response is “paltry’’ by comparison, said Representative Edward Markey, Democrat of Malden, who chairs the subcommittee and introduced a bill Friday that would redirect $50 million per year in oil and gas royalty payments for such technology.
In answers to Congress, most of the companies said they could not segregate costs for the safety- and spill-related research.
For example, ConocoPhillips said it spent $1.3 million over three years on research on safer drilling technologies, but did not specify how much it spends on accident prevention and spill-related research.
ExxonMobil said it spends $50 million a year on oil spill response, drilling, and deepwater development research activities. The company says it has maintained an internal spill research program for 40 years.
BP said the company spent $29 million over three years on safer drilling operations research. But spokesman Robert Wine said BP does not research oil spill cleanup technology. Instead, he said BP supports oil spill response organizations, such as the nonprofit Marine Spill Response Corp.
MSRC’s overall spending was $88 million in 2008, the most recent year for which its IRS filing was available. But it has no budget for research, MSRC spokeswoman Judith Roos told USA Today. Roos did not respond to calls and e-mails.
The oil and gas industry now is taking steps to explore new technology. BP has pledged $500 million for research efforts.
The federal government has spent relatively little to advance cleanup technology for spills.
Congress appropriated only about one-sixth of the $30 million in research grants to universities authorized under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 after the Exxon Valdez, according to the Coastal Response Research Center.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement — which was known as the Minerals Management Service until this month — collects $13 billion a year in oil drilling royalties. But the agency has been spending between $6 million to $7 million a year since 1995 on oil spill research.