Back to homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online BostonWorks Real Estate Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
2014 update: the Globe is launching

Crux, a Catholic news site

Please visit there for continuing Globe coverage of all Catholic issues.
 Latest coverage

April 7
Vt. church in record settlement

March 14
In Albany, bishop profile raised
Book Review: Guard of lies

February 28
Church hierarchy faulted
More than 80% of victims male

February 27
Diocese gives abuse data
Abuse peaked in '60s
2d man to aid Dupre case

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 24
Sniezyk clarifies his remarks

February 23
Prelate: Harm unrecognized

February 21
Springfield report questioned

February 20
Lawyer: Sermon riled accuser

February 17
4% of priests in US accused

February 12
Bishop resigns after claims

February 6
Arlington priest cited in suit

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

He tried 'to be another Christ for them'

By Globe Staff, 12/4/2002

 Related stories
Records detail shifting of priests
Priest invoked religion for sex acts
Quotes from Meffan interview
Records show a trail of deception
Life of a violent South Shore priest
Bishop's letters of warning ignored

Letter from Law to Rev. Morrissette
   December 13, 1984
Letter from Law to Rev. Forry
   March 28, 1988
Letter from Law to Rev. Burns
   April 16, 1991
Letter from Law to Rev. Meffan
   June 17, 1996
Letter from Law to Rev. Frost
   April 12, 1999

The following are quotes from a Globe interview with the Rev. Robert V. Meffan.

On whether he thought molesting teenage girls was wrong:

''I really didn't, because I had developed a wonderful relationship of love with these people, a real solid relationship of love, and I had no intentions of ever hurting anybody and ever causing any problems. They were youngsters who were daily communicants. That's the thing: They were kind of close to God, and I was trying to get them to love Christ even more intimately and even more closely. They were wonderful girls. I have no hatred toward them, no animosity toward them or anything like that. To me they were just wonderful, wonderful young people. It was a very beautiful, I thought, beautiful, spiritual relationship that was physical and sexual.''

On why he did it:

''What I was trying to show them is that Christ is human and you should love him as a human being. Don't think he's up there and he's spiritual and he's not human and physical. He's human, he's physical. That's what I was trying to point out to them. I felt that by having this little bit of intimacy with them that this is what it would be like with Christ. The other side of the coin is I know people feel that we were taught to be another Christ for them. We're taught at the seminary to be another Christ, and that's what I based my whole priesthood on: trying to be like Christ.''

On whether he violated his vow of celibacy:''I didn't think that was destroyed because I always felt that to destroy celibacy you really had to have intercourse; you'd have to be a father.''

This story ran on page A27 of the Boston Globe on 12/4/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.

© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy