[an error occurred while processing this directive] Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
2014 update: the Globe is launching

Crux, a Catholic news site

Please visit there for continuing Globe coverage of all Catholic issues.
 Latest coverage

April 7
Vt. church in record settlement

March 14
In Albany, bishop profile raised
Book Review: Guard of lies

February 28
Church hierarchy faulted
More than 80% of victims male

February 27
Diocese gives abuse data
Abuse peaked in '60s
2d man to aid Dupre case

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 24
Sniezyk clarifies his remarks

February 23
Prelate: Harm unrecognized

February 21
Springfield report questioned

February 20
Lawyer: Sermon riled accuser

February 17
4% of priests in US accused

February 12
Bishop resigns after claims

February 6
Arlington priest cited in suit

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Bishop's letters of warning ignored

By Michael Rezendes, Globe Staff, 12/4/2002

Bishop John M. D'Arcy (AP Photo)

 Related stories
Records detail shifting of priests
Priest invoked religion for sex acts
Quotes from Meffan interview
Records show a trail of deception
Life of a violent South Shore priest
Bishop's letters of warning ignored

Top church officials, such as Bishop John B. McCormack, have been implicated in systematic abuse coverups.  
Coverage of archdiocese coverups

Almost to a man, the bishops who worked under Cardinal Bernard F. Law played strong supporting roles as the archdiocese moved to quell complaints of sexual abuse by moving accused priests from parish to parish.

But the thousands of pages of church records released in clergy abuse lawsuits over the last year show that one bishop complained repeatedly about giving new assignments to problem priests - and was repeatedly ignored.

The warnings issued by John M. D'Arcy, now the bishop of the Fort Wayne-South Bend diocese in Indiana, began in 1978 with a polite letter to a fellow bishop reporting parishioner complaints about the Rev. Thomas P. Forry's temperament.

A year later, after Forry was accused of beating up his housekeeper, D'Arcy wrote to Cardinal Humberto S. Medeiros to complain that his earlier letter had been ignored, leaving parishioners with a priest beset by ''severe emotional problems.''

In November 1983, D'Arcy's concerns about another priest were even more pointed. In a letter to Bishop Thomas V. Daily, who was vicar general of the archdiocese, D'Arcy objected to a new parish assignment for the Rev. Richard A. Buntel, who had been accused of using drugs with young people and engaging in homosexual activity.

''I believe these allegations are true and if a man like this does not seek help, he should not be given an assignment,'' D'Arcy said.

He added: ''Young people are open to priests and when assaulted in this way, their souls are often irreparably damaged.''

In 1984, Law received the first of two cautionary letters from D'Arcy.

In the first, which became public earlier this year, D'Arcy expressed reservations about a parish assignment to Weston for the Rev. John J. Geoghan because of Geoghan's ''history of homosexual involvement [with] young boys.''

In the second, he objected to an assignment to the Office of Spiritual Development for the Rev. Robert V. Meffan, who had been accused of sexual misconduct with teenage girls.

D'Arcy, who declined to discuss his letter about Geoghan earlier this year, did not return a telephone call from the Globe yesterday.

The Rev. Robert W. Bullock, a leader of the Boston Priests Forum who knew D'Arcy as a student at St. John's Seminary, said that D'Arcy's warnings amount to a mixed message for Boston priests: positive because D'Arcy spoke up, but disturbing because he was the only one who did.

''Why weren't there more?'' Bullock said.

Michael Rezendes can be reached at rezendes@globe.com.

This story ran on page A27 of the Boston Globe on 12/4/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.

© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy