RadioBDC Logo
| Listen Live
< Back to front page Text size +

Security systems can confound consumers

Posted by Mitch Lipka  April 8, 2013 09:02 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Q. I am writing you about problems I have been having with a Protection 1 home security system. Since the system was installed a year and a half ago, we have had problems with three different smoke detectors giving off false alarms. The company charges close to $200 to come fix the problem, even though it is their equipment that is faulty. The company did waive a couple of those fees but has stopped doing so. We have had to make four service calls in the year and a half, in some cases to fix errors that their service people made on the previous call. Now, we are forced to buy a $10 a month warranty on the Protection 1 equipment so that we do not keep paying service fees every time there is an equipment problem. How can a company charge us money to fix equipment that is not owned by us?

Shawn Hanegan, Bedford

A. This home security stuff is complicated. Part of the problem is when one company swallows another company, which then makes fuzzy who owns what and who is responsible for what.

In this case, Protection 1 executive customer relations supervisor Nicole Green explained that the only equipment they consider to be the company’s property is the control panel. Smoke detectors and other devices that talk to that panel are the homeowners’ property, she said, even if they were installed by the company.

Customers are offered warranty plans, Green said, because of that. Given that your situation appeared a bit more tangled, Protection 1 – without explaining what provisions they made – have resolved your concerns.

The company prepared this statement: “We have contacted the customer and this situation has been satisfactorily resolved. Protection 1 has maintained a 95% customer satisfaction rating and an A+ Better Business Bureau Rating. On this occasion, we were able to satisfactorily answer the questions the customer had and clarify the facts surrounding this particular instance.”

For others dealing with home security companies, particularly if there’s a different company involved than the one you started with, it’s important to be understand what you’re responsible for and what additional costs you could be facing.

This blog is not written or edited by or the Boston Globe.
The author is solely responsible for the content.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article


About the author

Mitch Lipka is one of America's leading consumer journalists and advocates. He is an expert in product safety, recalls, scams, and helping consumers get out of jams. He is a nationally known consumer columnist and runs He lives in Worcester. You can find him on Facebook or reach him at


Browse this blog

by category