RadioBDC Logo
On Another Ocean | Fleet Foxes Listen Live

A municipal buzz

Legislation to ease formation of local utilities gets boost from storm

By Erin Ailworth
Globe Staff / September 10, 2011

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Text size +

Customer complaints about the response of utility companies to Tropical Storm Irene has revived interest in legislation that would make it easier for Massachusetts cities and towns to create their own municipal electric utilities.

Proponents say Irene, which left thousands of households without power for nearly a week, could be the catalyst that finally moves the legislation, which has languished on Beacon Hill for about a decade. The storm knocked out power to roughly 800,000 customers served by the state’s four investor-owned utilities, National Grid, NStar, Western Massachusetts Electric Co., and Unitil Corp.

In addition to spending days in the dark, many customers said they struggled to get information from power companies about when power would be restored. Already, customers in Lexington, Attleboro, Fitchburg, and Quincy have contacted the bill’s sponsors asking about forming local utilities after municipal lighting departments in communities such as Wellesley and Concord quickly restored power.

“Irene just underscores the critical nature of how important it is for us to pass this bill,’’ said state Representative Stephen L. DiNatale, Democrat of Fitchburg, who cosponsored the bill with state Representative Jay R. Kaufman, a Lexington Democrat.

The state has 41 municipal utilities, but no new one since the 1920s. The biggest obstacle has been the need for cities and towns to purchase power lines and other assets from investor-owned utilities. But those companies have no incentive to sell under Massachusetts law, since they would lose valuable infrastructure and customers.

The bill pending in the Legislature would give the state Department of Public Utilities more authority to establish a fair sale price and require investor-owned utilities to agree to a sale.

Supporters of municipal utilities say smaller power agencies could benefit some communities by potentially lowering electricity bills and giving local officials more control - especially in emergencies.

Patrick Mehr, a Lexington resident and spokesman for the Massachusetts Alliance for Municipal Electric Choice, which supports the creation of municipal utilities, said big utilities often don’t respond well, particularly when power is being restored after a big storm. Having a community-run utility, he said, could fix that problem because local officials would be responsible to their constituents.

Harvey Reiter, a lawyer who has worked with municipal power agencies, said a mix of public and private utilities creates competition that can help customers.

“There’s nothing inherently more or less efficient based on whether they’re government owned or private owned,’’ said Reiter, a partner at Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP’s Washington office. “What seems to drive their performance is the threat that they could be replaced.’’

NStar, National Grid, and Unitil, which have opposed efforts to make it easier to form municipal electric companies, question whether a community agency could better serve customers. “With respect to service, having access to resources from other parts of a large utility is a tremendous advantage,’’ said National Grid spokeswoman Jackie Barry, citing how the utility aided several municipal utilities hit by an ice storm in 2008. “With respect to costs, our ability to procure power at wholesale prices for millions of customers, our ability to spread capital and operations and maintenance costs over one million customers works to keep prices down.’’

Utilities have also lobbied against such proposals because of concerns about how the state Department of Public Utilities would set prices on assets they’d be forced to relinquish.

“Our main concern would be getting fair market value,’’ said Caroline Allen, spokeswoman for NStar, which this year has spent more than $70,000 opposing the municipal utility bill and other legislation. Similarly, National Grid spent $25,000.

It’s unclear whether new municipal utilities would benefit Massachusetts ratepayers. The rates charged by municipal utilities historically have been lower than those of investor-owned power companies, saving customers anywhere from $1 to $30, a month. But a 2010 study by the state Department of Energy Resources found that the cost of creating and running a municipal lighting agency today wouldn’t guarantee savings for customers.

In addition, investor-owned utilities are large taxpayers, and communities could lose millions in revenue if they were replaced by public entities. Utilities also are required by the state to provide special rates for low-income ratepayers, meet energy efficiency and renewable energy mandates, and regularly report on their performance. Municipal utilities are not bound by all those rules.

“What we stress is that going with the municipalization process is an extremely complex process,’’ said Alec O’Meara, a spokesman for Unitil, which has 28,000 customers in Massachusetts. “It’s a case-by-case situation. Each town is different, each community has different needs.’’

Erin Ailworth can be reached at Follow her on Twitter @ailworth.