< Back to front page Text size +

It's a clock! It's a scale! It's an atom?

Posted by Kevin Hartnett  January 21, 2013 02:33 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

7269415330_520ca449a3_b.jpgIt may have been awhile since you wondered, what exactly is a second? But think about it now and the question will nag at you.

In a discovery announced on January 10th, however, University of California, Berkeley physicist Holger Müller has given us a new and potentially more fundamental way to define time. His invention is the simplest clock ever constructed—based on a single atom of the soft metal cesium—that also stands to revolutionize (of all things) how we define a kilogram.

To understand how an atom can tell time, first consider the way that all clocks tell time: by counting. A grandfather clock counts swings of a pendulum. A digital watch counts oscillations in an electrical frequency. An atomic clock—the most accurate timepiece we have—counts microwave signals emitted by electrons as they transition between energy levels.

Müller’s clock counts oscillations of what’s called the “matter wave”- in this case, of a cesium atom. In his 1924 doctoral thesis French physicist Louis de Broglie followed on the work of Albert Einstein and Ernst Planck to propose that all matter can also act as a wave. The frequency of this “matter" wave is mindbogglingly fast, on the order of 3x10^25 cycles per second for cesium. Physicists have long thought that this frequency—known as the Compton frequency—is too fast to be measured, thus making matter waves unusable for marking time.

But as a post on Nature.com details, Müller discovered a way to measure cesium matter waves—albeit indirectly. He split a cloud of cesium atoms in half and shot photons from a laser into one half of the cloud, which slowed the frequency of those atoms. Then he rejoined the two groups of atoms, and as they recombined, he was able to measure the difference between their two frequencies—something on the order of 100,000 oscillations, a far more manageable number than the frequency of the matter waves themselves.

If the method behind Müller’s clock is mind-bending, the implications of his work are cool and fairly straightforward. In a press release issued by Berkeley and posted on Eureka Alert, Müller explained, “Every other clock involves a reference using at least two particles that interact. This Compton clock is the first to be based entirely on a single particle’s mass.”

Scientists prefer to base units of measurement on fundamental physical phenomena, because doing so makes science more exact and consistent. And because Müller’s clock is based on a single particle, it could provide the most elemental definition of a second ever constructed. "Our clock is accurate to within 7 parts per billion," he said in the press release. "That's like measuring one second out of eight years, about as good as the very first cesium atomic clock about 60 years ago. Maybe we can develop it further and one day define the second as so many oscillations of the Compton frequency for a certain particle."

At the same time, Müller’s work may also provide us with a more exact definition of a completely different unit of measurement: the kilogram. As the Globe reported in 2011, the current standard for a kilogram is a cylinder of platinum-iridium kept in a vault at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures outside Paris. It is a blunt and also unsustainable way of defining such an important unit of measurement: The reference cylinder is continually gaining mass as it absorbs contamination from the atmosphere. Müller’s technique for measuring matter waves raises the possibility of a more perfectly objective definition of the kilogram. Physicists can measure matter waves and, from those measurements, infer the weight of the underlying particles—which may make it possible in the future to define a kilogram as an exact number of atoms of a specific element.

Hardly bad work, for a clock.

Image of grandfather clock courtesy of Elliott Brown

This blog is not written or edited by Boston.com or the Boston Globe.
The author is solely responsible for the content.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

About brainiac Brainiac is the daily blog of the Globe's Sunday Ideas section, covering news and delights from the worlds of art, science, literature, history, design, and more. You can follow us on Twitter @GlobeIdeas.
Brainiac blogger Kevin Hartnett is a writer in Columbia, South Carolina. He can be reached here.

Leon Neyfakh is the staff writer for Ideas. Amanda Katz is the deputy Ideas editor. Stephen Heuser is the Ideas editor.

Guest blogger Simon Waxman is Managing Editor of Boston Review and has written for WBUR, Alternet, McSweeney's, Jacobin, and others.

Guest blogger Elizabeth Manus is a writer living in New York City. She has been a book review editor at the Boston Phoenix, and a columnist for The New York Observer and Metro.

Guest blogger Sarah Laskow is a freelance writer and editor in New York City. She edits Smithsonian's SmartNews blog and has contributed to Salon, Good, The American Prospect, Bloomberg News, and other publications.

Guest blogger Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, publisher, and freelance semiotician. He was the original Brainiac blogger, and is currently editor of the blog HiLobrow, publisher of a series of Radium Age science fiction novels, and co-author/co-editor of several books, including the story collection "Significant Objects" and the kids' field guide to life "Unbored."

Guest blogger Ruth Graham is a freelance journalist in New Hampshire, and a frequent Ideas contributor. She is a former features editor for the New York Sun, and has written for publications including Slate and the Wall Street Journal.

Joshua Rothman is a graduate student and Teaching Fellow in the Harvard English department, and an Instructor in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. He teaches novels and political writing.


Browse this blog

by category