< Back to front page Text size +

Too Connected to Fail

Posted by Josh Rothman  August 8, 2012 02:09 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Too big to fail”: thanks to the financial crisis, it’s a phrase we’re all familiar with. Now a group of European economists and physicists are suggesting that there might be a more useful way to think about banks. In “DebtRank: Too Central to Fail? Financial Networks, the FED and Systemic Risk,” a paper published this month in Nature’s Scientific Reports, Stefano Battiston, Michelangelo Puliga, Rahul Kaushik, Paolo Tasca and Guido Caldarelli argue that it’s not how a big a bank is that matters, but how connected it is to other banks. They’ve even devised a method, loosely based on Google’s PageRank algorithm, to analyze financial data and figure out which banks are the most connected, and, therefore, the most dangerous. The banks which are too connected to fail, it turns out, aren’t necessarily the biggest.

The financial system is deeply interconnected, and that interconnectedness makes it very hard to analyze. Banks borrow from, lend to, and own pieces of one another. Over time, a small number of banks can come to occupy central positions among the rest. If one of those banks stumbles, the repercussions ripple out in many directions – and, if many of them stumble simultaneously, a crisis can ensue. That’s true even for non-huge banks: Even a smallish firm can cause a crisis, if enough other firms are invested in it.

The problem, of course, is that identifying super-connected banks is very, very difficult. Banks can be connected in complex, recursive ways. You need to know not just how much a bank has borrowed, but what its “feedback centrality” might be when trouble starts. That, the researchers write, is where Google’s PageRank algorithm can serve as inspiration. Google’s search engine works by analyzing the links between webpages, with the goal of discovering the most influential ones. In their paper, the researchers take a similar approach, analyzing a large amount of data gathered by the Federal Reserve to figure out which banks might be influential, in a bad way. Their DebtRank algorithm, they write, “takes recursively into account the impact of the distress of an initial node across the whole network.” The higher a bank’s DebtRank, the more risk its failure would pose to the financial system as a whole. The algorithm even works across time: as a crisis unfolds, DebtRanks rise across the bank network, “meaning that the default of each of them would cause a larger economic loss.”

Right now the research is preliminary: In order to produce a truly accurate DebtRank table, the researchers would need access to a much larger dataset than the one they have now, which draws on a limited amount of information about a limited number of banks. (Greater financial transparency would help with that.) Still, they write, “our results suggest that the current public discussion on too-big-to-fail institutions should be broadened to the network-theory notion of too-central-to-fail.” Read the whole paper at Nature.

This blog is not written or edited by Boston.com or the Boston Globe.
The author is solely responsible for the content.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

About brainiac Brainiac is the daily blog of the Globe's Sunday Ideas section, covering news and delights from the worlds of art, science, literature, history, design, and more. You can follow us on Twitter @GlobeIdeas.
Brainiac blogger Kevin Hartnett is a writer in Columbia, South Carolina. He can be reached here.

Leon Neyfakh is the staff writer for Ideas. Amanda Katz is the deputy Ideas editor. Stephen Heuser is the Ideas editor.

Guest blogger Simon Waxman is Managing Editor of Boston Review and has written for WBUR, Alternet, McSweeney's, Jacobin, and others.

Guest blogger Elizabeth Manus is a writer living in New York City. She has been a book review editor at the Boston Phoenix, and a columnist for The New York Observer and Metro.

Guest blogger Sarah Laskow is a freelance writer and editor in New York City. She edits Smithsonian's SmartNews blog and has contributed to Salon, Good, The American Prospect, Bloomberg News, and other publications.

Guest blogger Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, publisher, and freelance semiotician. He was the original Brainiac blogger, and is currently editor of the blog HiLobrow, publisher of a series of Radium Age science fiction novels, and co-author/co-editor of several books, including the story collection "Significant Objects" and the kids' field guide to life "Unbored."

Guest blogger Ruth Graham is a freelance journalist in New Hampshire, and a frequent Ideas contributor. She is a former features editor for the New York Sun, and has written for publications including Slate and the Wall Street Journal.

Joshua Rothman is a graduate student and Teaching Fellow in the Harvard English department, and an Instructor in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. He teaches novels and political writing.


Browse this blog

by category