< Back to front page Text size +

Literature grad-school official on job placement: It's complicated!

Posted by Christopher Shea  April 7, 2010 11:16 AM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

In an essay for the Chronicle of Higher Education, Frank Donoghue, director of graduate admissions for the English department of Ohio State University, says many of the right things:  departments like his should offer better mentoring to Ph.D. candidates who statistics show are likely to fall through the cracks (like sixth- or seventh-year students); applicants to Ph.D. programs should receive a "brutal" briefing on career prospects in the humanities; many departments should admit fewer students. But he also says one very ridiculous thing that hints at just how deep runs the denial of people like him about their role in the humanities jobs crisis.

Donoghue begins his essay by bemoaning a "exasperating" question he often gets from Ph.D. applicants: "What's your department's placement rate?" That's a far, far too multifaceted question, he laments, to answer with one number, or even in one conversation. (Pity the naive applicant who asks Donoghue for the 100th time.) Only with "an 8,000-word essay," he writes, could he convey the sheer human complexity of Ohio State's placement record. The professor continues:

Let me give you a concrete example that illustrates my doubts about placement statistics. It's not really a hypothetical, but rather a thinly veiled description of a typical year in the placement annals of my own department. In that recent year, we graduated 11 Ph.D.'s; four did nationwide job searches, and two of them got tenure-track jobs. [my emphasis] The third of those four Ph.D.'s got a two-year appointment as a visiting assistant professor that may possibly be converted to a tenure-track job, and the fourth got a one-year postdoctoral fellowship. Of the seven other Ph.D.'s, five did limited searches for personal reasons, and none got job offers. They will try again next year and in the meantime will work as adjuncts. One received a tenure-track offer but turned it down so that he could accompany his partner, who has a tenure-track job at a better institution. The one remaining Ph.D. did not go on the job market at all, but instead accepted a position as an English teacher at a private high school, which from early on in his graduate career had been his professional ambition. Now, what was our placement rate? Any answer to that question can't be quantified ...

Well, here's a qualitative reaction: It's not very impressive.

And it took--speaking quantitatively--- only 199 words to find that out. So why not require, or allow, departments to provide a paragraph or two of context along with the allegedly oversimplified statistics? This really doesn't seem that complicated.

PS  How depressing is it that commentary on this issue has not advanced in the past half-dozen or even dozen years? (Especially depressing if you're old enough to have followed the debate that long ... )

chronillustration.jpg
Illustration: Jonathan Barkat for the Chronicle
This blog is not written or edited by Boston.com or the Boston Globe.
The author is solely responsible for the content.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

 
About brainiac Brainiac is the daily blog of the Globe's Sunday Ideas section, covering news and delights from the worlds of art, science, literature, history, design, and more. You can follow us on Twitter @GlobeIdeas.
contributors
Brainiac blogger Kevin Hartnett is a writer in Columbia, South Carolina. He can be reached here.

Leon Neyfakh is the staff writer for Ideas. Amanda Katz is the deputy Ideas editor. Stephen Heuser is the Ideas editor.

Guest blogger Simon Waxman is Managing Editor of Boston Review and has written for WBUR, Alternet, McSweeney's, Jacobin, and others.

Guest blogger Elizabeth Manus is a writer living in New York City. She has been a book review editor at the Boston Phoenix, and a columnist for The New York Observer and Metro.

Guest blogger Sarah Laskow is a freelance writer and editor in New York City. She edits Smithsonian's SmartNews blog and has contributed to Salon, Good, The American Prospect, Bloomberg News, and other publications.

Guest blogger Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, publisher, and freelance semiotician. He was the original Brainiac blogger, and is currently editor of the blog HiLobrow, publisher of a series of Radium Age science fiction novels, and co-author/co-editor of several books, including the story collection "Significant Objects" and the kids' field guide to life "Unbored."

Guest blogger Ruth Graham is a freelance journalist in New Hampshire, and a frequent Ideas contributor. She is a former features editor for the New York Sun, and has written for publications including Slate and the Wall Street Journal.

Joshua Rothman is a graduate student and Teaching Fellow in the Harvard English department, and an Instructor in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. He teaches novels and political writing.

archives

Browse this blog

by category