The Abbeville Institute, an academic club of sorts founded by a popular philosophy professor at Emory University, Donald W. Livingston, serves as a forum for academics who want to discuss a topic that's been out of fashion for roughly 145 years: secession. Why it's a good thing, that is--both in the abstract and in the American context, a useful check on overweening federal power. The group, with 64 "affiliated" scholars and counting, according to The Chronicle of HIgher Education, is preparing for its eighth annual conference, in February, in Charleston.
Up till now, the group has been quite secretive. (Even Livingston's departmental chair was unaware of his involvement.) But this year, for the first time, the institute is advertising its get-together. Is it possible that it sees a chance for a warm welcome in this season of tea-party protests?
On the one hand, members of the Abbeville Institute--named for the South Carolina birthplace of John C. Calhoun, perhaps the most famous antebellum advocate of states' rights--argue that its philosophical interests are all-American: the United States was born in an act of secession from Great Britain, after all. And certainly the Supreme Court has shown a fresh interest in states' rights in recent years. On the other, its members evince a distinct nostalgia for the Lost Cause, and a racial subtext--or surtext--can be found in its documents and in statements by its members.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups (it does not think Abbeville qualifies for that title), calls attention to the following language, from the group's mission statement "Rarely these days, even on Southern campuses, is it possible to acknowledge the achievements of white people in the South."
Says the law center's Heidi Beirich: "At the end of the day, they are just trying to revise the history of the South in favor of whites."
Livingston and others dispute that characterization, but his choice of analogies does give one pause. Defending the existence of both a distinct Southern way of life and a distinct Southern political philosophy, he says: "The Southern tradition as taught in the academy today, if taught at all, is studied mainly as a function of the ideological needs of others. It is not examined in terms of its own inner light. It is as if you had programs of Jewish studies explored from the point of views of Catholics, or worse, of Nazis."
PS. The Chronicle piece was written by the former Globe correspondent Ben Terris.
(Photo: Billy Howard for The Chronicle of Higher Education)
The author is solely responsible for the content.
Leon Neyfakh is the staff writer for Ideas. Amanda Katz is the deputy Ideas editor. Stephen Heuser is the Ideas editor.
Guest blogger Simon Waxman is Managing Editor of Boston Review and has written for WBUR, Alternet, McSweeney's, Jacobin, and others.
Guest blogger Elizabeth Manus is a writer living in New York City. She has been a book review editor at the Boston Phoenix, and a columnist for The New York Observer and Metro.
Guest blogger Sarah Laskow is a freelance writer and editor in New York City. She edits Smithsonian's SmartNews blog and has contributed to Salon, Good, The American Prospect, Bloomberg News, and other publications.
Guest blogger Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, publisher, and freelance semiotician. He was the original Brainiac blogger, and is currently editor of the blog HiLobrow, publisher of a series of Radium Age science fiction novels, and co-author/co-editor of several books, including the story collection "Significant Objects" and the kids' field guide to life "Unbored."
Guest blogger Ruth Graham is a freelance journalist in New Hampshire, and a frequent Ideas contributor. She is a former features editor for the New York Sun, and has written for publications including Slate and the Wall Street Journal.
Joshua Rothman is a graduate student and Teaching Fellow in the Harvard English department, and an Instructor in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. He teaches novels and political writing.