< Back to front page Text size +

The "Nobel Clawback Committee"

Posted by Christopher Shea  December 26, 2008 01:04 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

The financial meltdown has inspired lashings out at economists by professors in other disciplines. A classic example: a posting on The MIT PressLog by Trevor Pinch, a sociologist at Cornell and author of "Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies."* Economists, Pinch points out, did a dreadful job of anticipating the current crisis -- just as, seventy years ago, they failed to foresee the length and depth of the Great Depression.

And yet "aren't economists revered, the people we turn to and depend on for economic policy, and don't we award them a Nobel prize every year?" That's what burns, you see. It's not just that economists get the world wrong -- in theory and in practice -- but that they view themselves as superior to their sister social-science disciplines. (See this post by N. Gregory Mankiw, defending Lawrence Summers' hypothesis that economists are quite simply smarter than most other professors.) And the world, to some extent, accepts economists' lofty self-regard.

Pinch writes:

If you're a sociologist, like I am, it was particularly annoying to see the 1997 Nobel prize for economics handed out to Robert K Merton's son -- also called Robert Merton -- while the father who founded a whole sub-discipline of sociology (the sociology of science), wrote a marvelous book on the self-fulfilling prophecy (isn't that sorta relevant to events of today?), and was without question one of the greatest modern sociologists, never got a Nobel, because sociology presumably isn't a science.

"And what," Pinch adds, "did Robert Junior" -- a professor at Harvard Business School -- "get the prize for? The Black-Scholes formula." Which, as you may know, just happens to be the mathematical formula Wall Street uses to value derivatives -- including the financial instruments that underpinned the entire mortgage industry. Let's just say the formula didn't quite nail the risk-reward ratio.

If sociologists can't have a Nobel of their own, Pinch argues, then let's at least install some accountability into the current reward system. Every 10 years, Pinch suggests, a special Nobel Prize Clawback Committee would convene to see whether a given scholar's work had stood the test of time. If such a committee existed, Pinch contends, Merton would presently hold the underwhelming title of ex-Nobelist.

PS Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the much-in-demand former trader and author of "The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable," who made his name by more or less predicting the current debacle, has also been using Merton as a punching bag. On his Web site he goes further than to suggest that Merton's most prestigious award be revoked: "Robert C. Merton is perhaps the best case for the termination of tenure -- malpractice."

*UPDATE: Book title corrected 1/08/09, thanks to a commenter.

This blog is not written or edited by Boston.com or the Boston Globe.
The author is solely responsible for the content.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

4 comments so far...
  1. It should be mentioned that the economics prize isn't a real Nobel, and as such is more a symbol of the ersatz nature of the discipline than the high honor afforded other laureates.

    Posted by jhm December 27, 08 11:50 AM
  1. The greatest fraud in all this is the idea that nobody anticipated the current crisis - we vacation each summer with a high-level banker who warned us of exactly what ultimately transpired every year since about 2004. If we want to take back Nobels, an even stronger case can be made for clawing back the bonus money earned by the bankers involved, so the idea that this crisis was an unanticipated "act of god" clearly appeals to virtually everyone involved at this point. (Including the regulators who let it develop.) The credit crisis was no "Black Swan", but rather a classic bubble combined with a ponzi scheme, and as such, entirely predictable.

    Posted by JFY January 5, 09 10:04 AM
  1. I know it's hard to get things right, but the title of Mr. Pinch's book is "Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology and Technology Studies". Leaving out the word "Economic" really deflates the value of this post.

    Posted by Amy January 8, 09 10:12 AM
  1. Perhaps if the Nobel Prize for Economics were renamed,"The Nobel Prize for Economics, the Voo-Doo Science," the issue could be fairly resolved. Another possibility is "The Noble Prize for Sociopathic Economics." Either will do.

    Posted by Robert S. Rosengard ("Gandalf") January 8, 09 04:56 PM
 
About brainiac Brainiac is the daily blog of the Globe's Sunday Ideas section, covering news and delights from the worlds of art, science, literature, history, design, and more. You can follow us on Twitter @GlobeIdeas.
contributors
Brainiac blogger Kevin Hartnett is a writer in Columbia, South Carolina. He can be reached here.

Leon Neyfakh is the staff writer for Ideas. Amanda Katz is the deputy Ideas editor. Stephen Heuser is the Ideas editor.

Guest blogger Simon Waxman is Managing Editor of Boston Review and has written for WBUR, Alternet, McSweeney's, Jacobin, and others.

Guest blogger Elizabeth Manus is a writer living in New York City. She has been a book review editor at the Boston Phoenix, and a columnist for The New York Observer and Metro.

Guest blogger Sarah Laskow is a freelance writer and editor in New York City. She edits Smithsonian's SmartNews blog and has contributed to Salon, Good, The American Prospect, Bloomberg News, and other publications.

Guest blogger Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, publisher, and freelance semiotician. He was the original Brainiac blogger, and is currently editor of the blog HiLobrow, publisher of a series of Radium Age science fiction novels, and co-author/co-editor of several books, including the story collection "Significant Objects" and the kids' field guide to life "Unbored."

Guest blogger Ruth Graham is a freelance journalist in New Hampshire, and a frequent Ideas contributor. She is a former features editor for the New York Sun, and has written for publications including Slate and the Wall Street Journal.

Joshua Rothman is a graduate student and Teaching Fellow in the Harvard English department, and an Instructor in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. He teaches novels and political writing.

archives

Browse this blog

by category