RadioBDC Logo
| Listen Live
 
 
< Back to front page Text size +

Gustave Caillebotte's "Man at His Bath" a savvy addition to MFA collection

Posted by Alan Wirzbicki  September 19, 2011 01:36 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

To some art buffs, it sounds like lunacy: Boston's Museum of Fine Arts, this morning's Globe tells us, is planning to sell a bunch of paintings by big-name artists to raise the money to buy a much more obscure one — "Man at His Bath," a male nude by the Impressionist painter Gustave Caillebotte. Yet buying this painting, even at the hefty price of $17 million, would broaden and deepen the MFA's collection. It's precisely the kind of bold, adventurous move that a world-class museum ought to be making.

Caillebotte turns out to be an important figure in the history of Impressionism. That's partly because of his artwork, which featured humble scenes viewed from unusual perspectives, but also because of his later role as an art patron and collector himself.

Selling eight paintings to buy "Man at His Bath" is controversial for some obvious reasons: Several of the paintings headed to the auction block are by much more famous artists, including Claude Monet, Paul Gauguin, and Camille Pissarro. And those paintings were given to the MFA by generous donors who, perhaps, wanted the museum to have them forever.

Still, selling — or "deaccessioning" — these paintings seems to be the only option. Potential donors, who might not be shy about female nudes, aren't rushing in to help buy a painting showing some random guy's naked butt. "Man at His Bath," another objection goes, isn't a "classical nude" like Michelangelo's "David." But that's sort of the point of Caillebotte's work. Depictions of anonymous people in everyday situations, as opposed to gods and royals and Biblical figures, are a vital part of art.

The lack of eager donors now doesn't undercut the significance of "Man at His Bath," and Caillebotte's work may gain prominence over time as succeeding generations of his family sell off his paintings. Anyway, an art museum — like a music collection — should have aspirations that extend beyond the greatest hits, and selling familiar works to buy an unusual one fits that mission perfectly.

Twitter: @danteramos

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

ABOUT THE ANGLE Online commentary and news analysis from the Boston Globe. The Angle is produced by Rob Anderson and Alan Wirzbicki. You can follow Rob on Twitter at @rcand.

Editors' Picks

Tickets for T seat hogs?Tickets for T seat hogs?
Why the MBTA should punish riders who needlessly claim more than one seat.
T-shirts and democracyT-shirts and democracy
What souvenir sales teach us about reform in Myanmar
Lessons from Kony 2012Lessons from Kony 2012
Why Invisible Children films are the new textbook of civic engagement.
The Angle's comments policy
archives