RadioBDC Logo
| Listen Live
< Back to front page Text size +

It's not whether children's books are liberal or conservative — it's whether they're good

Posted by Jesse Singal  December 20, 2010 02:41 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

howtheleft.jpgEveryone should read Tom Scocca's great Ideas piece on the recent uptick in conservative children's books with very different messages from those presented by Dr. Seuss and other popular children's authors from years past.

I gave very little thought to the messages in the books I read (and was read) as a child. "Horton Hears a Who!," for example, I remember liking because... well, it was a cool story. And it rhymed! The actual moral content — "A person's a person, no matter how small," and all that — struck me as good and right and true in the way most of what we're taught as a child comes across as good and right and true. But that wasn't why I liked the book.

Scocca makes this point nicely:

The real classics chew up their own agendas and swallow the bones. Who cares that “The Cat in the Hat” was a pedagogical experiment, a paradigm-changing demonstration of how few words a book could really use? Who cares, for that matter, what it says about anarchy and authority and keeping secrets from parents? Literature and children alike are resistant to forced interpretation.

If you’ve read C.S. Lewis — and the cultural right loves C.S. Lewis — pause now and envision the land of Narnia. Did you picture it covered with snow? Everyone does. Lewis spent seven books developing Narnia into an all-seasons landscape of ever-more elaborate Christian allegory. But what sticks is the image from the very first book, “The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe” — the land of unredeemed, frozen fairy tale. Nothing in his dutiful theology can match the spell cast by the idea of a place where it is “always winter but never Christmas.”

That said, there are certainly children's books so transparently manipulative that their moral or political content overshadows any merits of the stories themselves. But in general, Scocca is right — a great story is a great story.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

ABOUT THE ANGLE Online commentary and news analysis from the Boston Globe. The Angle is produced by Rob Anderson and Alan Wirzbicki. You can follow Rob on Twitter at @rcand.

Editors' Picks

Tickets for T seat hogs?Tickets for T seat hogs?
Why the MBTA should punish riders who needlessly claim more than one seat.
T-shirts and democracyT-shirts and democracy
What souvenir sales teach us about reform in Myanmar
Lessons from Kony 2012Lessons from Kony 2012
Why Invisible Children films are the new textbook of civic engagement.
The Angle's comments policy