Shannon's 'Revolutionary' role

Michael Shannon as John Givings in Sam Mendes's film. Michael Shannon as John Givings in Sam Mendes's film. (FRANCOIS DUHAMEL)
By Susan King
Los Angeles Times / January 12, 2009
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

HOLLYWOOD - Michael Shannon is a big, imposing guy who has played a lot of intense, imposing characters in such films as "Bug," "Before the Devil Knows You're Dead" and "Shotgun Stories." In "Revolutionary Road," Sam Mendes's film about 1950s angst, Shannon cranks up the intensity to almost uncomfortable levels.

The film reunites "Titanic" stars Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio as April and Frank Wheeler, a married suburban couple who seek to break free of their staid existence. As John Givings, a brilliant mathematician who has suffered a mental breakdown, Shannon has two pivotal scenes with the couple, scenes in which his brutal honesty cuts to the very core of April and Frank's disintegrating relationship.

Q. I never knew the 1950s were so traumatic until I saw "Revolutionary Road."

A. It was an era of containment, it seems to me. People were trying to keep it all together and keep it inside. My dad, when I talk to him about that era, he was kind of wrestling with some of that, too.

Q. Does Richard Yates give John Givings a back story in the novel the film is based on?

A. There wasn't a huge amount of history given in the novel. He talks about the fact John was out west and he was a professor of mathematics. He had a breakdown and came home, and his poor mother was trying to take care of him. Basically, he wanted to kill her and blamed her for all of his problems.

Q. Did you do research on the effects of shock treatments?

A. I had a hard time finding anybody to talk to about it, but I did read about it, and I had read even before other accounts of people who had gone through shock treatments. One of my favorite musicians is Lou Reed, and I had read his biography where he had been subjected to numerous shock treatments.

Q. John says he's had some 30 treatments.

A. I think it's something we can all identify with in terms of the loss of control about what happens. When you find yourself in the situation where other people are deciding what's best for you - your ability to make decisions for yourself gets revoked. . . . He also seems to have found, at a certain point, a warped acceptance of it - "This is what's happening to me, and there is nothing much I can do about it. I am just going to make sure I punish as many people as possible."

Q. John really serves as a bookend to April and Frank's story.

A. He really is important to the story. It's a hard movie to describe to people when they ask you what it's about. But if you boil it down to its essence, it's about these two people - Frank and April - trying to make a decision: Do we stay here and suffer silently or do we try to liberate ourselves and escape to a better life? The first time we see John they are celebrating their decision and kind of reveling in this newfound sense of freedom. John is there to kind of celebrate and validate their decision. Then John comes back, and this freedom has crumbled, and he's there to castigate and punish them for their loss of faith. I think that's the really beautiful thing about the character.

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Save this article
  • powered by
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.